Board characteristics and firm performance
Väätäinen, Lauri Johannes (2020-05-12)
12.05.2020
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2020051229492
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2020051229492
Tiivistelmä
Lack of good corporate governance is often stated as one of the main reasons for the latest
financial crisis and collapses of big multinational companies. At the same time trends in privatization of firms, technology development and mobilization of capital have highlighted the
need for better monitoring and governance of the business. Since board of directors are the
main deciding part of the company it is important to study how different attributes and characteristics of the board impact on the financial performance of the firm. In this study, characteristics of board size, diversity, independence, affiliations and experience are studied in
the sample of S&P500 companies during the period of 2009-2017.
The main goal of the study is to discover if some of the board characteristics have significantly negative or positive impact on firm performance and can hereby increase the efficiency
in the company and modernize possibly outdated structures in the board. Previous studies in
the area of board characteristics have presented contradictory findings depending on the time
frame and studied market. Therefore, wider theoretical understanding makes the topic important to study.
As main findings of the paper, the thesis finds that S&P500 companies are lacking diversity,
but diversity in the boardrooms has increased steadily among years. Board diversity and
board experience are two characteristics which have positive impact on Tobin’s Q and return
on assets. For other independent variables, the thesis did not find significance. However, even
though the impact of diversity is positive it is important to understand that diversity itself is
unlike to increase performance. Similarly, increasing only experience does not guarantee increase in performance. As a conclusion, this thesis suggests to keep in mind also other factors
and limitation of endogeneity when finding the optimal level of board.
financial crisis and collapses of big multinational companies. At the same time trends in privatization of firms, technology development and mobilization of capital have highlighted the
need for better monitoring and governance of the business. Since board of directors are the
main deciding part of the company it is important to study how different attributes and characteristics of the board impact on the financial performance of the firm. In this study, characteristics of board size, diversity, independence, affiliations and experience are studied in
the sample of S&P500 companies during the period of 2009-2017.
The main goal of the study is to discover if some of the board characteristics have significantly negative or positive impact on firm performance and can hereby increase the efficiency
in the company and modernize possibly outdated structures in the board. Previous studies in
the area of board characteristics have presented contradictory findings depending on the time
frame and studied market. Therefore, wider theoretical understanding makes the topic important to study.
As main findings of the paper, the thesis finds that S&P500 companies are lacking diversity,
but diversity in the boardrooms has increased steadily among years. Board diversity and
board experience are two characteristics which have positive impact on Tobin’s Q and return
on assets. For other independent variables, the thesis did not find significance. However, even
though the impact of diversity is positive it is important to understand that diversity itself is
unlike to increase performance. Similarly, increasing only experience does not guarantee increase in performance. As a conclusion, this thesis suggests to keep in mind also other factors
and limitation of endogeneity when finding the optimal level of board.