Geopolitical shocks and carbon pricing: Do clean energy assets act as a hedge?

dc.contributor.authorDutta, Anupam
dc.contributor.authorMukharjee, Sourav
dc.contributor.authorUddin, Gazi Salah
dc.contributor.departmentInnolab
dc.contributor.facultyfi=Laskentatoimen ja rahoituksen yksikkö|en=School of Accounting and Finance|
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T09:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractWhile the interaction between geopolitical events and emission trading system (ETS) is somewhat complex, very little is known about how geopolitical shocks impact global carbon prices. In this study, we extend this scant literature by exploring the linkage between geopolitical risk (GPR) and the Chinese carbon markets. Given that geopolitical shocks may influence the Chinese ETS in several ways, such linkage merits an empirical investigation. Methodologically, we combine the Markov regime switching (MRS) model with the vector autoregressive (VAR) process and apply it to the Shenzhen and Hubei carbon markets. The results suggest that while the standard VAR model fails to capture any connection between geopolitical shocks and carbon returns, employing the MRS-VAR process reveals that GPR in fact exerts significant effects on the Chinese carbon markets implying that such effects appear to be regime-dependent. More specifically, the impact of geopolitical shocks is negative in the high volatility regime, but statistically insignificant in the low volatility regime. Further investigations show that higher geopolitical risk leads to higher hedging costs and that clean energy equities could be a suitable hedge for the Chinese carbon markets amid the periods of high geopolitical uncertainties. These outcomes have key implications which would be crucial for reaching the net-zero goals.en
dc.description.notification© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|
dc.identifier.citationDutta, A., Mukharjee, S., & Uddin, G. S. (2025). Geopolitical shocks and carbon pricing: Do clean energy assets act as a hedge? Energy Nexus 20, 100538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100538
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/19101
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe20251020102293
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.countryNETHERLANDS
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100538
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEnergy nexus
dc.relation.issn2772-4271
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100538
dc.relation.urlhttps://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe20251020102293
dc.relation.volume20
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifier7fcb0c2f-8e8c-4ef8-b3a6-60e386f8a1b1
dc.source.metadataSoleCRIS
dc.subjectGeopolitical Risk
dc.subjectCarbon markets
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectRegime switching
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectHedging
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Laskentatoimi ja rahoitus|en=Accounting and Finance|
dc.titleGeopolitical shocks and carbon pricing: Do clean energy assets act as a hedge?
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|en=A1 Peer-reviewed original journal article|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
nbnfi-fe20251020102293.pdf
Size:
1.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Kokoelmat