Twenty-Five Years of Corporate Political Activity Research in Asia: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

dc.contributor.authorTripathy, Avilasha
dc.contributor.authorMahapatra, Diptiranjan
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Huda
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Zaheer
dc.contributor.departmentfi=InnoLab|en=InnoLab|
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5538-3123
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-03T08:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractCorporate political activity (CPA) in Asia has attracted increasing interdisciplinary attention due to the region’s shifting institutional landscape and growing geopolitical significance. However, existing literature remains fragmented across theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and empirical settings. A dominant focus on relational CPA tends to obscure Asia’s broader and evolving spectrum of political strategies, as well as ongoing debates regarding their effectiveness and outcomes. In response, this study presents the first regionally focused, systematic literature review of CPA in Asia, synthesizing 323 studies published between 2000 and 2024. It evaluates the theoretical foundations, institutional and firm-level antecedents, strategy typologies, moderators, mediators, and outcomes that characterize CPA within the Asian context. While challenging Western-centric assumptions, we propose a typology that incorporates both Asia-specific CPA strategies, such as religious and cultural engagement, party-embedded structures, and the voluntary co-optation, and globally prevalent strategies, including trade association lobbying, relational ties, and political CSR, which are institutionally adapted across diverse Asian regimes. We then employ an integrative Antecedents–Phenomenon–Consequences framework and classify CPA outcomes into three domains: firm-level, institutional, and ethical/ governance-related. This review contributes by providing theoretical insights, clarifying when and how CPA leads to different outcomes, and demonstrating how political strategies vary across institutional environments. We conclude by identifying critical research gaps and suggesting future directions to engage more critically with Asia’s institutional heterogeneity and its implications for global CPA theory and practice.en
dc.description.notification© The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/19873
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026030317453
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-025-10080-y
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAsia pacific journal of management
dc.relation.issn1572-9958
dc.relation.issn0217-4561
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-025-10080-y
dc.relation.urlhttps://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2026030317453
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.identifierd5b96f89-d13f-4f20-bc24-bc22cfde17f9
dc.source.metadataSoleCRIS
dc.subjectNon-market strategy
dc.subjectCorporate political activity
dc.subjectAsia
dc.subjectDescriptive review
dc.subject.disciplinefi=InnoLab|en=InnoLab|
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Kansainvälinen liiketoiminta|en=International Business|
dc.titleTwenty-Five Years of Corporate Political Activity Research in Asia: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
dc.type.okmfi=A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä (vertaisarvioitu)|en=A2 Review article in a scientific journal (peer-reviewed)|
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
nbnfi-fe2026030317453.pdf
Size:
1.86 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Kokoelmat