NPM reconsidered : towards the study of enduring forms of NPM

annif.suggestionspublic administration|leadership (activity)|reforms|new public management|public sector|organisations (systems)|enterprises|administration (systems of a society)|public services|quality management|enen
annif.suggestions.linkshttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p775|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p554|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6795|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24108|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7104|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p272|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3128|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4328|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1285|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9907en
dc.contributor.authorDan, Sorin
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Per
dc.contributor.authorŠpaček, David
dc.contributor.departmentfi=Ei tutkimusalustaa|en=No platform|-
dc.contributor.facultyfi=Johtamisen yksikkö|en=School of Management|-
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-7282-
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Vaasan yliopisto|en=University of Vaasa|
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T12:53:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T13:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-17
dc.description.abstractIn this introduction to the special issue ‘The New Public Management: Dead or still alive and co-existing? State of play at 40+’ we suggest that we are witnessing two principal developments when it comes to NPM: its endurance in practice and reconsideration in theory. Building on recent research, we argue that NPM ideas and practices continue to be adopted, used, and tailored to meet reform requirements and preferences, resulting in enduring forms of NPM. Given its lasting influence on administrative practice, we propose the need for a reconsideration of the NPM paradigm within public administration scholarship. We conclude that NPM is a remarkable case of how management and governance ideas endure, leading to important implications for the conceptualization, research, and assessment of administrative movements and governance paradigms as they develop over time.-
dc.description.notification©2024 Taylor and Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Public Management Review on 17 Jul 2024, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2375561-
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|-
dc.embargo.lift2026-01-17
dc.embargo.terms2026-01-17
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.contentfi=kokoteksti|en=fulltext|-
dc.format.extent11-
dc.format.pagerange2531-2541-
dc.identifier.olddbid21341
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/17964
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/2779
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2024081465053-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.relation.doi10.1080/14719037.2024.2375561-
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPublic Management Review-
dc.relation.issn1471-9045-
dc.relation.issn1471-9037-
dc.relation.issue9-
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2375561-
dc.relation.volume26-
dc.source.identifierWOS:001271751300001-
dc.source.identifierScopus:85198728215-
dc.source.identifierhttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/17964
dc.subjectPublic sector reform-
dc.subjectPublic management-
dc.subjectPublic governance-
dc.subjectNew public management-
dc.subjectAdministrative movements-
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Julkisjohtaminen|en=Public Management|-
dc.subject.ysopublic administration-
dc.titleNPM reconsidered : towards the study of enduring forms of NPM-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|en=A1 Peer-reviewed original journal article|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|-
dc.type.publicationarticle-
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion-

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Osuva_Dan_Lægreid_Špaček_2024.pdf
Size:
452.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

Kokoelmat