Does the transition to the proof-of-stake consensus protocol tame the response of cryptocurrency volatility to energy shocks?

dc.contributor.authorGrobys, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorSandretto, Davide
dc.contributor.departmentfi=InnoLab|en=InnoLab|
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-01T10:01:00Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study investigates the impact of transitioning from the proof-of-work (PoW) to the proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus protocol on the relationship between cryptocurrency volatility and energy shocks. Design/methodology/approach We exploit the random nature of the transition to the PoS consensus algorithm as a quasi-natural experiment. We analyze this issue for the volatility processes of four digital currencies with high market capitalization using GARCH models. Findings Our cross-sectional findings suggest that after the transition to the PoS consensus protocol, cryptocurrency volatility becomes significantly less responsive to energy market shocks. Originality/value The findings of this study advocate for the migration from the energy-intensive PoW consensus protocol to the more environmentally sustainable PoS protocol. Moreover, this study advances the literature on green finance by documenting a strong case for cryptocurrency stakeholders to switch to the PoS protocol.en
dc.description.notificationThis author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com.
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/20078
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026040125021
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-04-2025-0729
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational journal of emerging markets
dc.relation.issn1746-8817
dc.relation.issn1746-8809
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2025-0729
dc.relation.urlhttps://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2026040125021
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.source.identifierWOS:001659580100001
dc.source.identifier2-s2.0-105027452542
dc.source.identifierb9794ee2-a709-4c9f-ba96-a0a00603e6f7
dc.source.metadataSoleCRIS
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectTransition
dc.subjectCryptocurrency
dc.subjectEthereum
dc.subjectProof-of-Stake
dc.subjectProof-of-Work
dc.subjectVolatility
dc.subjectEnergy shocks
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Rahoitus|en=Finance|
dc.titleDoes the transition to the proof-of-stake consensus protocol tame the response of cryptocurrency volatility to energy shocks?
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä (vertaisarvioitu)|en=A1 Journal article (peer-reviewed)|
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
nbnfi-fe2026040125021_2.pdf
Size:
696.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Kokoelmat