Eettisten toimintapolitiikkojen kompleksisuus hallinnollisissa systeemeissä

annif.suggestionsetiikka|hallinto|hyvä hallinto|politiikka|vaikutukset|EU-maat|intressit|sääntely|byrokratia|julkinen hallinto|fifi
annif.suggestions.linkshttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3166|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4328|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15366|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p454|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p795|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9828|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p18519|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10664|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14539|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p775fi
dc.contributor.authorAutioniemi, Jari
dc.contributor.authorDemmke, Christoph
dc.contributor.departmentInnolab-
dc.contributor.facultyfi=Johtamisen yksikkö|en=School of Management|-
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Vaasan yliopisto|en=University of Vaasa|
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-14T10:31:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T13:31:14Z
dc.date.available2022-04-14T10:31:35Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-07
dc.description.abstractThe complexity of integrity policies in administrative systems According to the article, regulating administrative ethics is becoming increasingly complex. This article is based on a survey commissioned by the European Parliament on conflict of interest policies and their effectiveness in the EU Member States. The trends of administrative ethics are grounded on the growth of ethics bureaucracy, individualization of integrity policies – and broadening of the concepts such as conflict of interest. This kind of conceptualization indicates that unethical behaviour is linked to ever-widening areas of life, which in turn can complicate the design, implementation, and effectiveness of integrity policies. Also, systemic differences were found. The EU Member States, determined by a traditional bureaucratic system, regulate conflicts of interest through more detailed laws than the EU Member States whose systems are based more on managerial management practices. However, hybrid systems stand out as the most widely regulated.-
dc.description.notification© 2022 Hallinnon Tutkimuksen seura.-
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|-
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.contentfi=kokoteksti|en=fulltext|-
dc.format.extent15-
dc.format.pagerange20-34-
dc.identifier.olddbid15843
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/13832
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/2251
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022041429274-
dc.language.isofin-
dc.publisherHallinnon tutkimuksen seura-
dc.relation.doi10.37450/ht.109183-
dc.relation.ispartofjournalHallinnon Tutkimus-
dc.relation.issn2343-4309-
dc.relation.issn0359-6680-
dc.relation.issue1-
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.37450/ht.109183-
dc.relation.volume41-
dc.source.identifierhttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/13832
dc.subjectadministrative ethics-
dc.subjectconflict of interest-
dc.subjectadministrative systems-
dc.subjectEU Member States-
dc.subjectethics reforms-
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Julkisjohtaminen|en=Public Management|-
dc.titleEettisten toimintapolitiikkojen kompleksisuus hallinnollisissa systeemeissä-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|en=A1 Peer-reviewed original journal article|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|-
dc.type.publicationarticle-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Osuva_Autioniemi_Demmke_2022.pdf
Size:
494.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artikkeli

Kokoelmat