Stakeholder Power Dynamics in Mega-Projects
Pysyvä osoite
Kuvaus
Opinnäytetyö kokotekstinä PDF-muodossa.
Mega-projects—large infrastructure and energy projects—create situations which require multiple stakeholder groups to work together despite their different power levels and distinct project priorities and competing interests. The stakeholder theory needs all stakeholders to participate in projects because this requirement establishes project legitimacy. The research examines how stakeholder power dynamics and inclusion and exclusion practices together with procedural justice perception, impact both mega-project legitimacy and sustainability.
The study followed a quantitative cross-sectional design which used stakeholder theory (Freeman 1984) and stakeholder salience theory (Mitchell et al. 1997) and procedural justice theory (Colquitt 2001 Tyler 2006). The researchers collected data through a 50-item structured questionnaire which they distributed electronically to professionals who worked on large-scale infrastructure and PPP projects. The researchers analyzed 51 valid responses through SPSS and Python which included descriptive statistics and Cronbach's alpha and correlation matrices and multiple regression and mediation analysis through Hayes' PROCESS macro.
The results show that when stakeholders are included in projects their perception of procedural justice increases which then leads to higher project legitimacy. The study identified power distribution within the organization as a small elite group who controlled all decision-making power while most stakeholders only participated symbolically or lacked access to decision-making. The organization experienced legitimacy challenges because top-down governance systems together with senior management pressure and nonexistent feedback mechanisms created an environment which lacked transparency. The public assessed projects which followed procedural fairness standards as both sustainable and socially acceptable.
The research demonstrates how procedural justice functions in mega-project governance while it establishes a connection between salience theory and fairness perceptions. The research presents practical solutions which create fair engagement practices and inclusive decision-making processes and governance models that protect legitimacy. The study shows that organizations view fairness as strategically important for their business operations. The decision-making process needs to include all stakeholders while maintaining transparency because these factors determine both project legitimacy and sustainability and project success over time.