Revisiting the intellectual capital research landscape – a systematic literature review

annif.suggestionsaccounting|enterprises|human capital|leadership (activity)|immaterial capital|business|strategic leadership|organisations (systems)|research|reportingen
annif.suggestions.linkshttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7621|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3128|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9328|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p554|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9327|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2439|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5767|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p272|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p183|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p668en
dc.contributor.authorHussinki, Henri
dc.contributor.authorGaranina, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorDumay, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorSteinhöfel, Erik
dc.contributor.departmentfi=Ei tutkimusalustaa|en=No platform|-
dc.contributor.editorOrdóñez de Pablos, Patricia
dc.contributor.editorEdvinsson, Leif
dc.contributor.facultyfi=Laskentatoimen ja rahoituksen yksikkö|en=School of Accounting and Finance|-
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Vaasan yliopisto|en=University of Vaasa|
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-30T07:13:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T13:38:16Z
dc.date.available2022-10-19T15:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-09
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) is to provide insights on intellectual capital (IC) research models in terms of their preference for a single IC element or multiple IC elements, as well as how this varies between researchers from different continents. This aspect is critical, as recent literature has stressed that a firm needs an interplay of multiple IC elements to create IC-based value. This SLR is conducted by reviewing all the relevant research papers from the 20 top accounting and 20 top management journals published between 2000 and 2017. The results suggest that European researchers have contributed mostly to the multi-element perspective of IC, while American scholars have had the most notable impact on the single-element studies. These results are discussed by critiquing the current state of the IC literature and by offering transformative ideas for future research directions.-
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|-
dc.embargo.lift2022-09-09
dc.embargo.terms2022-09-09
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.contentfi=kokoteksti|en=fulltext|-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-429-28588-2-
dc.identifier.olddbid11725
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/10692
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/2457
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202003309598-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.relation.doi10.4324/9780429285882-
dc.relation.isbn978-0-367-25067-6-
dc.relation.ispartofIntellectual capital in the digital economy-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge Advances in Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management-
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429285882-
dc.source.identifierhttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/10692
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Laskentatoimi ja rahoitus|en=Accounting and Finance|-
dc.subject.ysoaccounting-
dc.subject.ysoenterprises-
dc.subject.ysohuman capital-
dc.subject.ysoleadership (activity)-
dc.subject.ysoimmaterial capital-
dc.subject.ysobusiness-
dc.subject.ysostrategic leadership-
dc.subject.ysoorganisations (systems)-
dc.subject.ysoresearch-
dc.subject.ysoreporting-
dc.titleRevisiting the intellectual capital research landscape – a systematic literature review-
dc.type.okmfi=A3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa|en=A3 Peer-reviewed book section|sv=A3 Del av bok eller annat samlingsverk|-
dc.type.publicationbookPart-
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion-

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Osuva_Hussinki_Garanina_Dumay_Steinhöfel_2020.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
book_chapter

Kokoelmat