Drawing conclusions about what co-participants know : knowledge-probing question– answer sequences in new employee orientation lectures

annif.suggestionslearning|teaching and instruction|learning organisation|interaction|lecturers|enterprises|lectors and lecturers|lectures|information|questionsen
annif.suggestions.linkshttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2945|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2630|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9728|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10591|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1116|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3128|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2556|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15875|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p261|http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7272en
dc.contributor.authorMikkola, Piia
dc.contributor.authorLehtinen, Esa
dc.contributor.departmentfi=Ei tutkimusalustaa|en=No platform|-
dc.contributor.facultyfi=Markkinoinnin ja viestinnän yksikkö|en=School of Marketing and Communication|-
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Vaasan yliopisto|en=University of Vaasa|
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T13:50:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T12:35:38Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T13:50:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-17
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to uncover the processes of interaction through which knowledge acquisition in new employee orientation is monitored and controlled. Using video-recordings of orientation lectures as data, the study focuses on question–answer sequences in which the lecturer’s question probes into the state of the employees’ knowledge; in particular, it looks at the third turn of the sequence, in which the lecturer comes to a conclusion concerning the participants’ knowledge. This is shown to be an unavoidably practical accomplishment, which is contingent on both the often ambivalent responses of the participants and the design of the knowledge-probing question. Also, the lecturer orients to being responsible for providing the employees with the necessary knowledge that they do not have. The study contributes to discussion of the interactional organization of knowledge in institutional settings, and it sheds light on the pros and cons of lectures as interactional encounters.-
dc.description.reviewstatusfi=vertaisarvioitu|en=peerReviewed|-
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.contentfi=kokoteksti|en=fulltext|-
dc.format.extent26-
dc.format.pagerange516-538-
dc.identifier.olddbid11715
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/10690
dc.identifier.urihttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/523
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202003269457-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSage-
dc.relation.doi10.1177/1750481319847361-
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDiscourse and communication-
dc.relation.issn1750-4821-
dc.relation.issn1750-4813-
dc.relation.issue5-
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319847361-
dc.relation.volume13-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0-
dc.source.identifierhttps://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/10690
dc.subjectconversation analysis-
dc.subjectknowledge-probing question-
dc.subjectlecture-
dc.subjectmultimodality-
dc.subjectnew employee orientation-
dc.subjectquestion–answer sequence-
dc.subject.disciplinefi=Viestintätieteet|en=Communication Studies|-
dc.subject.ysolearning-
dc.subject.ysoteaching and instruction-
dc.subject.ysolearning organisation-
dc.subject.ysointeraction-
dc.subject.ysolecturers-
dc.subject.ysoenterprises-
dc.subject.ysolectors and lecturers-
dc.subject.ysolectures-
dc.subject.ysoinformation-
dc.subject.ysoquestions-
dc.titleDrawing conclusions about what co-participants know : knowledge-probing question– answer sequences in new employee orientation lectures-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|en=A1 Peer-reviewed original journal article|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|-
dc.type.publicationarticle-
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion-

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Osuva_Mikkola_Lehtinen_2019.pdf
Size:
711.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
article

Kokoelmat