Do Social Consumption and Investment Patterns Drive Environmental Quality?
Ladataan...
Hyväksytty kirjoittajan käsikirjoitus - 545.44 KB
Huom! Tiedosto avautuu julkiseksi: 08.04.2028
Alola, A. A., Doganalp, N., Onifade, S. T., Jiang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2026). Do Social Consumption and Investment Patterns Drive Environmental Quality? Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71021
© 2026 Wiley. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Alola, A. A., Doganalp, N., Onifade, S. T., Jiang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2026). Do Social Consumption and Investment Patterns Drive Environmental Quality? Sustainable Development., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71021. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
Pysyvä osoite
Kuvaus
To further understand the dimensions of responsible consumption and investment, this investigation explores how environmental quality is impacted by the consumption of social goods and services and the patterns of investments. By considering a panel of 30 Chinese provinces over the period 2007–2019 and comparing the fixed effects and random effects estimators, the results summarily indicate that expenditure on science and technology (with elasticity of ~0.07) and investment in research and development (with elasticity of ~0.01) are the only investment instruments with emissions abatement impacts while both the levels of investment in fixed assets (with elasticity of ~0.01) and consumption of social goods and services (with elasticity of ~0.7) constitute environmental degradation. Additionally, fixed assets investment, population density, government financial spending, and economic growth are contributing to environmental degradation, while natural resources and labor force are environmentally beneficial. This outcome further helps China's strategic policy that promotes sustainable and responsible consumption and investment behavior.
Emojulkaisu
ISBN
ISSN
1099-1719
0968-0802
0968-0802
Aihealue
Kausijulkaisu
Sustainable development
OKM-julkaisutyyppi
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä (vertaisarvioitu)