Data Privacy, Ethics and Education in the Era of AI – A University Student Perspective
Rousi, Rebekah; Alanen, Hanna-Kaisa; Wilson, Anne S. (2024)
Rousi, Rebekah
Alanen, Hanna-Kaisa
Wilson, Anne S.
Editori(t)
Olsson, Thomas
Sahlgren, Otto
Parviainen, Jaana
Westerstrand, Salla
Harviainen, J. Tuomas
Laitinen, Arto
Rantala, Juho
RWTH Aachen
2024
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202501236452
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202501236452
Kuvaus
vertaisarvioitu
© 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CCBY4.0).
© 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CCBY4.0).
Tiivistelmä
In today’s world nothing has been left untouched in relation to artificial intelligence (Al). Al is used for everything from mowing lawns to reporting news. One field in which its presence is highly complex and multifaceted is education. Discussions regarding both the role of Al and the role of learning in education have taken center stage. The field of tertiary education has proven particularly problematic in terms of Al adoption. Ethical issues have arisen across the domain including whether or not generative Al should be used in education and how, the ethicality of learning analytics, and privacy concerns. With the aim of gaining insight into the sentiment of tertiary level students towards privacy in the era of widespread Al, the authors conducted an interview study with nine university student participants. The interviews concentrated on: privacy in studies and student life; data privacy advocacy; level of protection provided by
tertiary institutions (universities); understandings of the General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR); and bodily sensations linked to privacy. The results reveal differences of opinion regarding concern for privacy, yet there was overall consensus that GDPR aided in protection against privacy violation. Findings indicate a tendency towards resignated acceptance and genuine concern for the ethics of university technology-related data practices.
tertiary institutions (universities); understandings of the General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR); and bodily sensations linked to privacy. The results reveal differences of opinion regarding concern for privacy, yet there was overall consensus that GDPR aided in protection against privacy violation. Findings indicate a tendency towards resignated acceptance and genuine concern for the ethics of university technology-related data practices.
Kokoelmat
- Artikkelit [3030]