Non-IFRS and changes in accounting institutions : lessons from Nokia
Rautiainen, Antti; Järvenpää, Marko; Mättö, Toni (2022-05-18)
Rautiainen, Antti
Järvenpää, Marko
Mättö, Toni
SAGE Publications
18.05.2022
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022091959479
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022091959479
Kuvaus
vertaisarvioitu
©The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us-sagepub-com.proxy.uwasa.fi/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
©The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us-sagepub-com.proxy.uwasa.fi/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Tiivistelmä
We analyse the lessons learned from Nokia to illustrate the changing focus in accounting and organisational practices that affect the perceptions of relevant accounting work and the key measures of success. In the course of an analysis covering 25 years, the introduction of management accounting innovations was first emphasised regarding managerial relevance but were later replaced by financial accounting emphasis and innovations (e.g. non-IFRS reporting). Our data includes public reports, newspaper articles and 21 interviews made between 1996 and 2019. We present a framework for analysing shifts in the focus of accounting. Our case analysis on changing accounting practices, on shifting perceptions of relevance and reliability, and on primary measures of success, contributes to understanding the focus of key accounting measures in historical developments regarding perceived success or failure, and in changing institutional practices in terms of ‘institutional work’, especially through valourizing either the actions or valourizing reports.
Kokoelmat
- Artikkelit [2895]