Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • OSUVA
  • Artikkelit
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • OSUVA
  • Artikkelit
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Embracing dynamic tensions : Peacekeeping as a balancing act of complexity

Paananen, Soili; Puustinen, Alisa; Raisio, Harri; Jalonen, Harri (2022-06-14)

 
Katso/Avaa
Artikkeli (737.2Kb)
Lataukset: 

URI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13535

Paananen, Soili
Puustinen, Alisa
Raisio, Harri
Jalonen, Harri
Wiley
14.06.2022
doi:10.1111/puar.13535
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022080252508

Kuvaus

vertaisarvioitu
© 2022 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Public Administration. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Tiivistelmä
The article examines how military leaders serving as peacekeepers navigate complexity and adapt to it. The theoretical underpinnings of the study are linked to adaptive peacebuilding and Complexity Leadership Theory, and specifically to how enabling leadership through adaptive space helps to work with the local conflict dynamics and change to sustain peace. The findings are based on 29 interviews with military leaders with command experience in peacekeeping operations. The findings introduce five dimensions that unpack complexity into structural, functional, security-related, professional, and steering-related complexity and provide empirical evidence on balancing actions relating to complexity in a peacekeeping context. The article develops an analytical framework for peacekeeping. It also contributes to Complexity Leadership Theory by unpacking the complexity into dimensions, unpacking the actors into groups and communities with commitments, and addressing power relations and the dark side of their emergence.
Kokoelmat
  • Artikkelit [2101]
https://osuva.uwasa.fi
Ota yhteyttä | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

TekijäNimekeAsiasanaYksikkö / TiedekuntaOppiaineJulkaisuaikaKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
https://osuva.uwasa.fi
Ota yhteyttä | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste