An examination of comment letters concerning an increase in audit exemption thresholds. Evidence from Finland

Abstract

This study examines how interest groups have reacted to the suggested increase in the audit exemption thresholds in Finland. The results suggest that the lobbying opponents objected to the increase because of the benefits gained from the auditing of financial statements. Considerable reliance is placed on the audited accounts of Finnish small firms in maintaining societal functionality. Hence, the results are supported by the public interest theory. In contrast, the comment letters that supported the increase highlighted the need to follow international trends. The findings of the lobbying behaviour suggest that the interest groups collected information and strategically transferred it to the ministry with the objective of influencing the regulatory outcome. To conclude, this study contributes to a more detailed understanding of the role that the key arguments both for and against the proposed regulatory change played in the case of increasing the audit exemption thresholds. Finally, this study joins existing lobbying literature and contributes to this stream of research by shedding light on the importance of the argumentation strategies used in the Finnish case.