Legal Innovation in Contracting, and Beyond : Merging Design and Technology Tools for the Information Age
Barton, Thomas D.; Haapio, Helena; Hazard, James G.; Passera, Stefania (2021-03-02)
Barton, Thomas D.
Haapio, Helena
Hazard, James G.
Passera, Stefania
Editori(t)
Masson, Antoine
Robinson, Gavin
Springer Nature
02.03.2021
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202104019171
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202104019171
Kuvaus
vertaisarvioitu
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a book chapter published in Mapping Legal Innovation: Trends and Perspectives. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47447-8_8
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a book chapter published in Mapping Legal Innovation: Trends and Perspectives. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47447-8_8
Tiivistelmä
During the Industrial Revolution, the structure and methods of Western legal systems facilitated commercial expansion and technological innovation. But as the Information Age gradually re-shapes pre-conditions for successful innovation, legal systems generally—and contracting in particular—may be obstructing rather than enabling continuing growth. To re-align commercial and technical needs with legal methods, traditional legal systems must themselves innovate. This Chapter highlights three perspectives for imagining legal innovation: first, alternative structures for contracting, like relational/collaborative and outcome/performance-based contracts; second, information design tools like simplification and visualization, and computer coding tools; and finally, systemic measures designed to resolve the kinds of problems that have increasingly challenged traditional legal methods. Throughout, the Chapter adopts the attitudes and methods of Proactive/Preventive Law to untangle the difficult relationship between law and innovation: stronger innovation requires the law to offer diverse methods, flexibly applied, to meet varied contextual needs; and yet any new legal reform must be efficient and feasible as well as effective and just.
Kokoelmat
- Artikkelit [2800]