Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tppc20 Production Planning & Control The Management of Operations ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tppc20 Artificial intelligence in operations management and supply chain management: an exploratory case study Petri Helo & Yuqiuge Hao To cite this article: Petri Helo & Yuqiuge Hao (2021): Artificial intelligence in operations management and supply chain management: an exploratory case study, Production Planning & Control, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2021.1882690 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1882690 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 01 Apr 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 12964 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Artificial intelligence in operations management and supply chain management: an exploratory case study Petri Helo and Yuqiuge Hao Department of Industrial Management, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland ABSTRACT With the development and evolution of information technology, competition has become more and more intensive on a global scale. Many companies have forecast that the future of operation and sup- ply chain management (SCM) may change dramatically, from planning, scheduling, optimisation, to transportation, with the presence of artificial intelligence (AI). People will be more and more interested in machine learning, AI, and other intelligent technologies, in terms of SCM. Within this context, this particular research study provides an overview of the concept of AI and SCM. It then focuses on timely and critical analysis of AI-driven supply chain research and applications. In this exploratory research, the emerging AI-based business models of different case companies are analysed. Their relevant AI sol- utions and related values to companies are also evaluated. As a result, this research identifies several areas of value creation for the application of AI in the supply chain. It also proposes an approach to designing business models for AI supply chain applications. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 30 November 2019 Accepted 26 August 2020 KEYWORDS Artificial intelligence; operations management; supply chain management 1. Introduction The concept of supply chain already existed a long time ago and is as old as the products themselves have been. The supply chain is a complex and integrative concept that cov- ers the entire production and distribution channels from sup- pliers, manufacturers, distributors, and ultimately the end customer. Typically, the goals for the supply chain are to ful- fil customer demand, improve responsiveness, and create a network among different stakeholders. Nowadays, the supply chain network is becoming more and more distributed, diverse, and transparent in terms of its business structure, business tasks, and stakeholders (Seyedghorban et al. 2020). The major problem for many organisations is that the visibil- ity of entire supply chain and the degree of information available within company are not optimal (Seyedghorban et al. 2020). Therefore, the aim of Supply Chain Management (SCM) is to digitalise the business process, to integrate differ- ent stakeholders and assets to ensure that the products are in harmony with the customer’s needs and to achieve goals related to total system competitive advantage (Tammela, Canen, and Helo 2008). Many traditional IT systems are dedicated to supporting various business processes in logistics and supply chain, such as ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), MES (Manufacturing Execution System), PPC (Production Planning & Control), SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition), etc. (Haas 2020). Advanced technologies have digitalised almost every operational process to control manufacturing across entire supply chains (Schiavone and Sprenger 2017). However, these fragmented solutions are not ‘intelligent’ enough (i.e. not able to act rationally based on the environment), and not very suitable for current SCM, due to the dynamic nature of the supply chain, rapidly changing customer demand, unstructured decision problems, and the constantly changing status of business processes. To establish intelligent, rapid and effective business response systems, it is vital to operate with the highest efficiency in all major activities and business flows in the supply chain. Therefore, more advanced IT sys- tems are required to deal with multi-level, highly variable problems of industrial operations in digitalisation (Seyedghorban et al. 2020). Recently, the possibilities of applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology have gained increasing attention in many industries (Dubey et al. 2019). AI refers to the ability of machines to learn from experience and make decisions on series of performance as a human with intelligence (Duan, Edwards, and Dwivedi 2019). AI is an emerging field in com- puter science due to the latest developments in deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks, mathematical opti- misation techniques used in operations research, constraint programming, and various numerical methods. These advan- ces have made it possible for computers to conduct tasks that have previously been possible for humans only. According to Russell and Norvig (2016), the objective of an AI is ‘to create rational agents who can perceive and act such that some objective function is optimised’. Examples of this kind of task are related to machine vision, natural CONTACT Yuqiuge Hao Yuqiuge.hao@uwasa.fi Department of Industrial Management, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland � 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1882690 language processing, pattern recognition, problem-solving for decision support, and learning systems. The definition of AI by AAAI (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence) is ‘advancing the sci- entific understanding of the mechanisms underlying thought and intelligent behaviour and their embodiment in machines’. This definition shows that AI is quite tolerant of different technologies, and one could say even agnostic. A widely-used textbook by Russell and Norvig (2016) states that AI is the intelligence of machines and software, a branch of computer science designed to create this intelligence. The purpose of AI is to try to understand intelligent entities (Soleimani 2018). From a technological point of view, the features of AI can enable the building of new kinds of functionality for informa- tion systems running operations and logistics. By studying previous research and cases, AI can be implemented in the following areas: 1. Learning systems that can adjust behaviour based on dynamically observed data (Baryannis, Dani, et al. 2019; Li and Liu 2019); 2. Situation-aware systems which can detect and under- stand the prevailing conditions, and adjust behaviour according to modes and situations (Min 2010; Singh et al. 2020); 3. Autonomous decision-making systems which can execute decisions in contrast with traditional Decision Support Systems (DSS) (Zijm and Klumpp 2016; Dwivedi et al. 2019); 4. The ability to process streaming images, video, audio and non-structured text type of data (Erhan et al. 2014; Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). The AI research community has been connected to DSS and other approaches in the area of operation management, such as planning and scheduling since the 1960s (Nemati et al. 2002; Çaliş and Bulkan 2015). Currently, AI has a holistic impact on SCM. The technical reasons are that the develop- ment of machine learning and most intelligent technologies start in SCM. The business reason for implementing AI in SCM is that the adoption of AI can increase visibility and transparency in the supply chain, and can also improve con- sumer products/services and customer satisfaction. Many big players in the technology field have put the effort in applying AI in SCM, such as Amazon, Walmart, Philips, eBay, etc. (Dwivedi et al. 2019; Mahroof 2019). Although a lot of emerging research exists, extensive studies on the role of AI in SCM remain relatively scarce due to a limited understanding of this phenomenon. Thus, in order to enhance knowledge of AI in SCM, this paper aims to study two research questions: what are the possible applications of AI in operations management and supply chain manage- ment, and what are the expected business impacts of such implementations? With these research questions, this paper investigates the concept of AI and its applications in SCM. It shows how to integrate different AI techniques and the future trends of advanced technologies in the operational process, and how they together facilitate cost-effective sup- ply chain solutions and provide greater visibility to decision- makers at a high level. This paper also explores how various forms of AI-powered SCM improve everything from process automation to process optimisation. We answer our research questions by analysing data collected from four leading com- panies and their solutions in real-life in how they leverage AI in their supply chains. The report also provides an evaluation of AI in SCM. The ultimate objective is to build up a compre- hensive view of the development of AI technology linked to SCM. The remainder of this paper is as follows: Section 2 presents the concept and methods of artificial intelligence, as well as insights into ways of developing and deploying AI in SCM. Section 3 is concerned with the methodology used in this study, and the exploratory research method is introduced. The case study in Section 4 illustrates four examples of AI implica- tions and impacts, and inn Section 5 we discuss implications and also summarise a framework for AI typology in the context of SCM. Finally, we present conclusions in Section 6. 2. Theoretical background 2.1. AI concept Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a loosely defined term that can refer to several technologies. John McCarthy coined this con- cept at the time of the famous Turing Test in 1950. This field has had a long history since the Dartmouth workshop in 1956. However, it did not attract high interest at the begin- ning. From the early 2000s, AI made rapid progress and received new attention, and AI has been reconsidered in research areas and applications in recent years. AI combines the science and engineering of making intelligent machines. Therefore, the objectives of AI can be considered to be both scientific goals and engineering goals. Scientifically, AI is the study and design of a branch of intelligent agents being developed to understand the envir- onment rationally and take actions intelligently (Russell and Norvig 2016; Soleimani 2018). Many other fundamental disci- plines, i.e. philosophy, mathematics, cognitive science, eco- nomics, neurosciences, and linguistics serve as roots in AI, and they overlap with each other (Solomonoff 1985). These root concepts build up an intelligent system that can mimic human behavioural patterns and solve real-world problems (Min 2010). For instance, philosophy contributes to the pri- mary component of how a machine or a physical system can learn and operate based on a set of rules. Mathematics pro- vides a formal representation of these rules designed based on algorithms and probability. Cognitive science includes studies of how humans think and act, and when applied in AI, it shows how computers think and learn different things. Linguistics focuses on how language and thinking are related. Neuroscience provides the study of brain functioning and how brains and computers are (dis)similar. The scientific side of AI attempts to explain real human intelligence. In terms of engineering, AI is an umbrella term for any intelligent system. It is a cross-disciplinary research area of both computer science and data science. As distinguished 2 P. HELO AND Y. HAO from the classical computing system, in which a computer is told what to do precisely, in AI, a computer should have the ability to learn from a massive amount of given historical data (experience) and find a pattern on their own, then make decisions and find solutions accordingly (Min 2010). AI is con- cerned with how to process data, how to give computers the sophistication to perceive the surrounding environment, and also how to act intelligently with algorithms and synthesis (Russell and Norvig 2016; Nilsson 1980). Technically, AI requires vast amounts of data, immense data processing, and (for the most part) cutting-edge statistical methods (Davenport 2018). AI consists of many sub-fields that use a variety of techniques such as machine learning (ML), cyber-physical systems (CPS), expert systems, natural language processing (NLP), vision proc- essing, speech processing, neural networks, robotics, etc. (Duan, Edwards, and Dwivedi 2019). These techniques enable the system to achieve ‘intelligence’ from different aspects. They both support and interact with each other. Typically, sev- eral methods are used in one AI application. These techniques will be discussed in the following section. Figure 1 shows AI- related concepts and terminologies and the techniques sup- porting AI. AI is thriving and has become more and more popular in recent years because of various organisational and environ- mental factors, such as dynamic customer expectations, intense global competition, overall digitalisation in compa- nies, and a rapidly changing technological landscape (Dubey et al. 2019). The three main technological driven forces can be summarised as increasing computing power, increasing quantities of data, and increasingly advanced algorithms: � Cloud infrastructure is becoming more and more mature. It is the mainstream computing resource in today’s tech- nical infrastructures. Many companies, such as Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Salesforce, are making robust computing infrastructure available via the Cloud (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). With this infrastructure, AI can be bought or rented as needed. � The growing amount of data is collected from sensor feeds, business transactions, and operations (Lee et al. 2019). These data are valuable assets for business but also present a big challenge in terms of extracting the desired knowledge. Big Data-heuristic algorithms are the solution to this challenge. They can be utilised to gain critical insights into operations and supply chain, and also provide correct information based on an intelligent, selective search of the whole set of massive data (Lamba and Singh 2017; Kolinski et al. 2020). � Algorithms (model) are more advanced and superior in many applications that were once done best by humans (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). This force is also an out- come of the combination of the two forces above (cloud infrastructure and data amount). The classic algorithms are memory-based filtering algorithms. They have been replaced by more efficient and robust systems based on machine learning (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). Several previous research studies have analysed not only the business benefits of AI but also the barriers to AI adop- tion (Davenport and Ronanki 2018; Ransbotham et al. 2018; Chui and Malhotra 2018). The commonly recognised obstacles and challenges of AI are as follows: � Without top management and a clear AI strategy in the organisation, there will be a failure of AI. It is critical to have a specific goal and correct direction in moving towards AI. � It is challenging to implement AI throughout the entire organisation with existing processes and systems if the company lacks robust technological infrastructure and collected data. � Other most often reported inhibitors of AI in the current situation are expensive AI related-technologies and the high expense of talented expertise with appropriate skillsets in AI. There are several excellent examples of AI and state-of- the-art applications, including IBM Watson’s AI app develop- ment platform, DeepMind’s AlphaGo to play chess, Google Translate, autonomous vehicles, style imitation in picture processing, recommendation system, Email filter, handwriting recognition, face detection/recognition, and so on (Schoemaker and Tetlock 2017; Dwivedi et al. 2019). In this paper, the most commonly used methods of AI are selected and listed as follows: � Machine learning (ML): This is the most crucial technology of AI, which enables machines not only to process data but also to process unstructured knowledge. ML-based systems can learn from data, identify patterns from large numbers of examples, make decisions based on struc- tured feedback, and then perform tasks on their own. Ultimately, these systems can keep improving their Figure 1. Artificial Intelligence as an umbrella term. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 3 performance and problem-solving skills with minimal human intervention (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). � Artificial neural networks (ANN): theory was inspired by the biological nervous system. It uses an interconnected network of computer memories to achieve the learning from precedent examples and experience, and to distin- guish features, recognise patterns, cluster objects, and process ambiguous or abstract information (Min 2010; Singh and Challa 2016). ANN is an advanced generation of ML algorithms. It works on large data sets and requires more computing power and specialised computer archi- tectures (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). � Machine Vision (MV): MV refers to the technology and methods used to recognise objects, interpret content and extract information from an image or a video on an auto- mated basis. It is different from image processing, where the output is another image (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017). MV technology is widely used in object recognition and image understanding. � Expert System (ES): ES is a computer program that solves problems or gives advice based on well-deliberated calcu- lations and unmanageable amounts of data: these tools produce analyses and help to evaluate alternative deci- sion options (Jarrahi 2018). The sub-files of ES include rule-based systems that generally require human experts and knowledge engineers to construct a series of rules in a particular knowledge domain (Davenport 2018), and decision support systems which assist the decision-maker in addressing uncertain demand (Baryannis Validi, et al. 2019). � Natural Language Processing (NLP): NLP-powered systems can be used to extract information or meaning (i.e. enti- ties, locations, topics, sentiment, etc.) from previous pat- terns in speech or text. This is achieved by statistical analysis of words or phrases (that is, statistical NLP), or based on semantic analysis and ontologies (decompos- ition and relationships among words and phrases: that is, semantic NLP) (Davenport 2018). � Speech Processing (SP): SP refers to the using of digital signal processing techniques to transmit speech into speech digital signals (Fu and Sun 2017). Speech recogni- tion technology and other data capture technologies are used to implement the voice-directed system. This system provides audio prompts directing instructions to users. Users can also respond by speaking and verbally confirm- ing the completion of tasks back to the system (Fu and Sun 2017; Levy 2018). � Robotics: Robotics is an interdisciplinary branch of engin- eering and science that includes mechanical engineering, electronics engineering, information engineering, com- puter science, and others. It includes two parts: the first is the ‘presentation layer’ concerning the design, construc- tion, operation, and use of robots; and the second part is the ‘technical layer’ with focus on computer systems in terms of their rule engines, control, sensory feedback, and information processing, workflow and orchestration tools (Davenport 2018). � Evolutionary Computation (EC): EC includes different algo- rithms to solve the optimisation problem. The techniques of EC mostly include genetic algorithm, ant colony opti- misation, swarm intelligence, and neuro-evolution. These algorithms mainly reflect the process of natural selection, where the fittest individuals are selected for reproduction to produce offspring of the next generation. Many researchers adapt known algorithms to their needs and propose a new name, so that numerous different AI approaches are introduced (Hengstler, Enkel, and Duelli 2016). However, most of the AI methods are statistical in nature (Davenport 2018). Before embarking on an AI initia- tive, it is crucial to understand which technologies perform what types of tasks and best address specific needs (Davenport and Ronanki 2018). The techniques of AI share the same fundamental hypotheses: computation is a useful way to model intelligent behaviour in machines. They all have their strengths and limitations. However, they usually reinforce and overlap with each other. 2.2. Artificial intelligence and supply chain management Supply Chain Management (SCM) is a complex concept. There are various definitions of SCM. From the business pro- cess perspective, a supply chain (SC) often spans the entire globe and involves production, trade, and logistics organisa- tion around the world (Zijm and Klumpp 2016). From the business function perspective, SC concerns the management and synchronising of three flows, namely the product flow from suppliers to final customers, the financial flow of money from customers to suppliers, and also the information flow connecting suppliers and customers (Kochak and Sharma 2015; Li and Liu 2019). From the business entity perspective, SC represents not only the products but also the entire sys- tem of organisations, people, resources, and even services (Stefanovic and Stefanovic 2009). To achieve such a high level of sophistication, SCM solutions are typically designed to facilitate all the major flows among different functions, both within and between enterprise organisations. Based on the predictions of Gartner, at least 50% of global companies will adapt their IT infrastructure with AI- related technologies and transform their supply chain opera- tions by 2023 (Panetta 2018). Organisations can integrate their SCM solutions with intelligent technologies to improve business in terms of process automation. Organisations can make smarter planning decisions, increase the agility of their digital supply network, reduce costs, and gain more pro- found and broader insights into their supply chains, with greater visibility into static and real-time data. However, the potential for the application of AI has not yet been fully explored in the SCM area. Baryannis, Validi, et al. (2019) have revealed that a SCM approach is considered as AI if it satisfies both of the following characteristics: that it can autonomously decide on a course of action that leads to success in SCM-related objectives and can do so under a partially unknown supply chain environment. Put simply, AI-based SCM can make decisions based on self- 4 P. HELO AND Y. HAO learning in any scenario. Soleimani (2018) points out that AI techniques can be implemented in four identified attributes in SC: optimisation, prediction, modelling and simulation, and decision support. Choi et al. (2018) summarise six areas in which big data and various machine learning methods are applied in the operation management field: forecasting, inven- tory management, revenue management and marketing, trans- portation, supply chain management, and risk analysis. These areas are also related to AI. There are several key ways in which these transform- ational technologies empower SCM businesses. It would be interesting to explore AI use cases across different sectors. Walmart, as one of the largest retailer, is leveraging its AI capability to process considerable volume of data. ‘Social Genome’ is a Big Data analytics solution designed by Walmart to provide customers better services through analysing cus- tomers’ activities on different social media. By creating insight of customer’s preferences and behaviours, Walmart is able to inform the direct target customer about one product’s infor- mation (Roden et al. 2017). ABB is collaborating with IBM Watson to build an AI plat- form for its ABB Ability. This combination aims to obtain real- time cognitive insights for companies in utilities, industry and transport. For instance, ABB and IBM will leverage Watson’s artificial intelligence to help in finding the defects of an asset from both real-time production images captured through an ABB system, and also historical data from IoT on the factory floor. The manufacturer will get real-time alert messages about its critical faults by using this solution. Another interesting example of using AI solutions to improve its business is Infinera, a manufacturer of telecom equipment. It optimises a predictive solution for its SCM by using Intrigo Systems, in combination with the AI-powered OLPP platform from the company of Splice Machine. Infinera uses machine learning to make better predictions about delivery dates by analysing past variability in production lead times and logistics provider performance (Korolov 2018). This makes Infinera able to survive and stay in business when the depression economic environment. In order to improve its inspection work and product qual- ity simultaneously, the Japanese company NEC has devel- oped a warehouse product inspection system by making use of image recognition technology in logistics operations. The system can make an instantaneous judgement on whether or not products to be shipped match the products on the shipment schedule list. Differently from others, it does not use an attached barcode or other ID information, but uses a unique image recognition technology (Umeda et al. 2017). Despite the relatively short history of AI in SCM as a dis- tinct research field, several articles have been published that review related literature. Table 1 summarises the current implementation and applications of AI in SCM in existing research. Most are real-world applications, and some of them are still proof of concept studies. They are classified by differ- ent business partners, business purposes, and AI methods. Of course, those methods interplay with each other and are used together to implement an application, and each application can be used in different business processes. Based on analysis of the current implementation of AI in SCM, it can be seen that AI can address SCM problems from two main aspects: advanced automatic infrastructure and optimised business processes. � Advanced automatic infrastructure: it can be recognised that AI has gradually improved the decision-making pro- cess with supply chains by utilising knowledge and data in the automated systems (Baryannis, Validi, et al. 2019). AI improves SCM both internally (within a given enter- prise) as well as between supply chain members (e.g. cus- tomer-supplier chains). However, it is critical that AI systems can leverage and optimise the efforts of a com- bination of artificial and human intelligence in addition to fully automated decision making. � Optimised business processes: AI can optimise business processes in three main steps: (1) monitoring: companies can monitor goods and operations in real-time by con- necting equipment, products and vehicles with IoT sen- sors; (2) analysing: the collected data can also be used in advanced analytics, and actionable insights generated to help companies to better understand the business; (3) acting: companies can improve their business and effi- ciency based on the valuable insights obtained and tak- ing reasonable actions. 2.3. Developing and deploying AI models in SCM As summarised in previous sections, the core of AI, different to traditional ‘rule-based software programming’, rather ensures that machines have the capability of defining and training models, engineering features or variables, of tweak- ing parameters, rebuilding models, and retraining and updat- ing models (Davenport 2018). AI techniques have been widely used to extract useful information from data. The techniques infuse intelligence into the systems to automatic- ally learn and adapt to the changing environment using his- torical experience through training (Lee et al. 2019). It is essential to realise that AI has the ability of repetitive train- ing in analysing data, learning from data, and storing know- ledge (Singh and Challa 2016). However, in order to implement AI and deploy the training, a considerable amount of high-quality data is required. Moreover, it is vital to use the right data sources to train the model. Otherwise, it is not able to get good results/right decisions. 2.3.1. AI training Many recent studies on training machine learning and neural network models to achieve business forecasting purposes have demonstrated that AI that can perform a variety of intelligent business tasks. For instance, various forecasting methods are introduced for different tasks, such as detecting credit risk (Zhu et al. 2019), reducing the bullwhip effect (Singh and Challa 2016), inventory level (Paul, Azeem, and Ghosh 2015), and for customer demand (Kochak and Sharma 2015). Cavalcante et al. (2019) focussed on the application of supplier selection by defining risk profiles of suppliers. On PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 5 the other hand, Lyutov, Uygun, and H€utt (2019) focussed on customer management. Both Goli et al. (2019) and Baryannis, Dani, et al. (2019) demonstrated how to predict and manage risks in the product portfolio and in the supply chain. Based on this previous research, a model-training based AI approach is summarised for a general-purpose AI learning process. Figure 2 demonstrates the primary steps of develop- ing and deploying AI models. � Data collection and preparation: This step includes two main activities. First of all, data col- lection means collecting data from industrial sensors and entire IoT systems in real-time, and from business transaction- driven systems, etc. for the model training purpose (Min et al. 2019). Of course, other unstructured data are also collected, such as text and documents (Lyutov, Uygun, and H€utt 2019). The second activity is required to screen the raw data, drop duplicate or irrelevant data records, handle missing data attrib- utes, and extract indicators and features by labelling the data needed in the learning/training process. It is crucial to map the data based on knowledge in business models (Lee et al. 2019; Min et al. 2019). Based on previous experiments, in order to train and validate the model the collected and trans- formed data must be divided into two groups: the training set and the test set, which are randomly divided by approximately Table 1. Links between AI Methods and Applications in SCM. Business partner Business purpose Applications in SCM AI method Reference Supplier Supplier selection Supplier selection/Partner selection Machine Learning; Expert System; Artificial Neural Network Cavalcante et al. 2019; Soleimani 2018; Wu and Barnes 2014 Minimizing supplier risk/Forecasting SMEs’ credit risk in supply chain finance Machine Learning Zhu et al. 2019; Soleimani 2018 Manufacturer Order intake Order-picking system Expert System Manzini, Gamberi, and Regattieri 2005 Chabots and intelligent assistants for operational procurement Natural Language Processing Davenport 2018 Automatic spare part and service orders Reinforcement Learning Hellingrath and Lechtenberg 2019; Mortazavi, Khamseh, and Azimi 2015 Spare part demand forecasting Neural Network Amirkolaii et al. 2017 Quality control Inventory control Expert System; Reinforcement Learning; Artificial Neural Network Paul, Azeem, and Ghosh 2015; Singh and Challa 2016 Automated quality control Machine Learning Tellaeche and Arana 2013 Production planning and control Production optimisation /production capacity improvement/lead time reduction Machine Learning Min et al. 2019 Monitor and predict the conditions of the cutting tool and the bearing Neural Networks; Machine Vision Lee et al. 2019; Soleimani 2018 Services and Maintenance Fraud detection/prevention Machine Learning Davenport 2018; Baryannis, Dani, et al. 2019 Call Centre Automation (Switchboard) Speech Processing Brynjolfsson, Rock, and Syverson 2018 Condition-based maintenance (predictive maintenance) Recurrent Neural Network; Convolutional Neural Network Lee et al. 2019 Smart connected products Situation aware products Natural Language Processing Jung, Hur, and Kim 2018 Autonomous products Deep Learning, Reinforcement Learning Brynjolfsson, Rock, and Syverson 2018 Logistics Transportation Accurate demand forecasting (Reduce the Bullwhip Effect) Neural Networks Singh and Challa 2016 Post-processing monitoring Neural Networks Kousiouris et al. 2019 Self-driving cars Machine Vision Brynjolfsson, Rock, and Syverson 2018 Vehicle routeing and scheduling Evolutionary Computation Levy 2018 Warehouse Voice picking Speech Processing, Neural Network Miller 2004; Gupta and Jones 2014 Robot picking Machine Learning, Robotics Hengstler, Enkel, and Duelli 2016 Automatic container unloading Robotics Hengstler, Enkel, and Duelli 2016 Virtual Assistants Speech Processing Neural Network Hengstler, Enkel, and Duelli 2016 Object inspection Machine Vision Jarrahi 2018 Fault detection Neural Network Hengstler, Enkel, and Duelli 2016 Retailer Sales process Customer clustering Machine Learning, Neural Networks Knoll et al. 2019 Hellingrath and Lechtenberg 2019 Detecting process errors Neural Network Hengstler, Enkel, and Duelli 2016 Suggesting better products and service Machine Learning Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2017 Customer Customer interfaces Customer requirements management Machine Learning Lyutov, Uygun, and H€utt 2019 Chatbots and intelligent assistants for customer services Natural Language Processing Dwivedi et al. 2019 Get insights from the consumer preferences Machine Vision Choi, Wallace, and Wang 2018 6 P. HELO AND Y. HAO 70% and 30% of the entire data set (Cavalcante et al. 2019; Goli et al. 2019; Baryannis, Dani, et al. 2019). � Model training: This is where the actual learning happens. The machines can extract knowledge by repeat learning and achieve accept- able forecasting accuracy, regardless of the size of the data set (Zhu et al. 2019). Different types of training algorithms are applied to a data training set (a subset of the entire data to learn from). The training target is used to construct an accur- ate mapping relationship based on available data and current algorithms (Min et al. 2019). The training set is used to train the model and construct an accurate mapping relationship based on available data and current algorithms (Min et al. 2019). The training datasets should contain all the features needed for the model and should have low noise (Paul, Azeem, and Ghosh 2015). The model training and the result evaluation steps are iterated until the best predictive model is found to be then actually used in the real world. � Run-time model: The final step is a try-out step that deploys the model within the actual business process in a real-life environment. The testing data set will be used to test the accuracy of the model (Lee et al. 2019). This testing set, while independent of the training set, follows the same probability distribution. The model must be revalidated in the latest environment and optimised according to the results and feedback (Min et al. 2019). In some instances, additional features may need to be included in the model and this is a necessary step before actually using the training model for security and effectiveness reasons (Min et al. 2019). Now the well-trained models can automatically predict or forecast in actual busi- ness processes and make an optimal decision to a given problem. Step 1 to step 3 is not a one-time process but a repeating cycle. In the first round of the practice loop, a lot of manual work is needed for preparation and business understanding. But in the subsequent rounds, all tasks are expected to be executed automatically by the computers between the phys- ical IoT (data sources) and the cyber-network (internet). The frequency of repetition depends both on the business requirements and on computing performance (Min et al. 2019). 2.3.2. Technological infrastructure Based on Figure 3, the technological infrastructure can be considered from two main parts, namely Data Collection Infrastructure and Model Training Infrastructure. The Data Collection Infrastructure is designed for the cen- tralisation of collecting real-time and historical data to be used by the model training (Min et al. 2019). Various indus- trial information systems are integrated to support the data and information communications (Min et al. 2019; Haas 2020), such as manufacturing execution system (MES), which realises real-time and dynamic monitoring and control of the entire production process; supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system and the programmable logic controller system (PLC), which directly controls the reaction parameters of machines; and warehouse management sys- tem (WMS), which utilises complex algorithms to direct the personnel in performing warehouse tasks, etc. (Min et al. 2019; Gupta and Jones 2014). In addition to data from industrial information systems, the Internet of Things (IoT) makes it possible to collect more relevant data from manufacturing shop-floors by enabling remote sensors to communicate with central networks or even with other products. Technologies such as radio fre- quency identification (RFID), wireless sensor networks (WSN), and Bluetooth low energy devices, e.g. beacons, are used (Xu, Xu, and Li 2018; Cavalcante et al. 2019). Moreover, the Figure 2. Process for developing and deploying AI models. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 7 IoT system should have specific edge calculation abilities and automatic analysis functions (Min et al. 2019). In edge com- puting architecture, distributed edge nodes are connected to several sensors and analyse the data from the sensors and IoT devices at distributed servers. Therefore, both data collec- tion and computational tasks are completed in a distributed manner. A distributed and decentralised way for processing the data can release the stress of centre computing because training data needs a lot of computation power. The partici- pation of more edge nodes to increase the training dataset can also increase the accuracy of the training model com- pared to the traditional approach (Singh et al. 2020). The second part of the technological infrastructure is the Model Training Infrastructure, which mainly consists of cloud computing, big data analysis, and machine learning. These are connected to the Data Collection Infrastructure in the first part to provide decentralised and secure big data ana- lysis of collected data. Cloud computing is a fundamental technology. It is used to support the collection, selection, and analysing of data from ambient environments using centralised methods. AI- enabled data centres must be run on a cloud-based server. All these sensor and computing systems store and manipu- late a massive amount of data, which is highly heteroge- neous (including both structured and unstructured data points) and diversified (Choi, Wallace, and Wang 2018), and requires very speedy processing. This requirement leads to the rapid development of big data analytics. Additionally, the successful implementation of machine learning generally requires training data. The ability to con- tinuously learn from training data can improve the machine learning algorithms and also create a more competitive advantage (Choi, Wallace, and Wang 2018). Davenport (2018) emphasises the importance of training data and incremental learning in AI rather than the mastery of AI technology. However, this approach is very challenging. It not only requires the presence of good computing memory so that the knowledge discovered by the trained datasets will be well-stored (Choi, Wallace, and Wang 2018), but also high level of requirements in terms of IT architecture related to its security, privacy, and resource constraints (Singh et al. 2020). 2.3.2. Data sources As noted in the training of AI models, the processing of training and testing requires the collecting and then prepar- ing of the data for analysis. In both steps, it must be under- stood in the data pre-processing what data needs to be obtained and why. It is paramount to collect relevant data and create a proper dataset. SCM strategies often depend on rapid and adaptive decision-making based on potentially sig- nificant, multidimensional data sources (Baryannis Validi, et al. 2019). As analysed in Baryannis, Dani, et al. (2019), data sources concerning the supply chain are numerous and can be divided into internal and external ones. Internal data sources include purchasing, production, delivery and sales records, GPS and container sensor information, firm finances, Figure 3. Links between different data sources and their use cases in the supply chain. 8 P. HELO AND Y. HAO and human resources data. External sources are not directly related to the supply chain and can include news items, wea- ther reports, social media activity, national and international policies, and so on. Haas (2020) considered the data from four different information carriers: transactional data, analyt- ical data, unstructured data, and linked data. Successful AI algorithms must be trained on the right data sources, or they will not be able to make the right decisions. � Structured data: Structured data, even in tabular form, can usually be found without substantial effort in stand- ard software systems for classic processes such as ware- house or order management. Machine data, which are also mainly subject to a structure, can be called up either via machine-specific or standardised interfaces. As auto- mation progresses, these processes are increasingly con- fronted with big data, meaning that machines or monitoring systems (e.g. driving behaviour or tempera- ture) generate large volumes of data (Haas 2020). Recording, processing, and interpreting human data and information sources require completely different instru- ments than the mechanical extraction of data from tables and machines. � Unstructured data: Unstructured data consist of textual documents, social media, and ratings from customers. One of the critical features of machine learning is its cap- ability of processing unstructured data to identify con- textual patterns in the conversation. It can improve the knowledge extraction process. Social media information can be used for sentiment analysis and emotional detec- tion, which is valuable for customer relation- ship management. � Sensor data: Several applications can be envisioned by sensor data, such as reducing the uncertainty of customer demand based on consumer behaviour, mitigating trans- portation-related risks by real-time monitoring of the dis- tribution centres, increasing visibility and trust among suppliers (Baryannis, Validi, et al. 2019), and also enhanc- ing industrial products through machines’ ‘digital twins’ (Davenport 2018). � New data types: Advanced technologies, such as speech recognition and natural language processing, are now providing more unique types of data, for instance voice transcripts, or information from an image/video. This intangible information can be converted into editable text and easily interpreted with no manual work being required anymore. GPS can capture location information and convert it into numerical data, which can be used easily. Therefore, new opportunities and new use cases can be created with new data types. 3. Methodology In order to illustrate and demonstrate how AI can be imple- mented in SCM and improve SCM overall performance, exploratory research is conducted in this particular study. Childe (2011) and Choi, Cheng, and Zhao (2016) pointed out the importance of an exploratory case study with a literature background review in the research community. It is widely recognised that the case study approach is widely used in supply chain-related research (Skender and Zaninovi�c 2020; Ramanathan et al. 2017). Based on the fundamental nature of exploratory research, qualitative research through multiple case studies is adopted as a best-fit technique (Yin 2003). 3.1. Research design Figure 4 shows the procedure of exploratory research that is applied in this particular research. In the beginning, it is essential to perform an in-depth analysis of existing literature to create a comprehensive understanding of basic concepts. It is vital to follow an acknowledged literature guideline to conduct a rigorous literature review. Therefore, a structured literature review has been conducted to identify (i) the basic concept of AI, (ii) its applications in previous research on the topic of AI and SCM, and (iii) the technical requirements for implementing AI in SCM. This systematic literature review helped to better understand the technological background of AI and its related features. However, there are still research gaps on how to implement an integrated AI Figure 4. The approach of exploratory research. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 9 solution to support the entire supply chain management. This paper seeks to fill the research gaps, and also aims to gain familiarity with the concept of AI, and acquire new insight into AI-powered SCM. The second part of this research is an exploratory case study. Different applications of AI in SCM are analysed to investigate the contemporary phenomenon in real-life, and also to discover the state of the studied phenomenon (Yin 2003). The case study method was selected because its char- acteristics are suited to the purpose of this research. Multiple case studies can help researchers to understand the studied phenomenon (Stake 2005) and also develop new approaches to operations management. The combination of case study and other research meth- ods offers a wide range of data acquisition and analysis. Therefore, the last step of this research is to generalise the concept of AI-powered SCM. Each case should be studied separately in-depth to understand the phenomenon, but also all the cases should be analysed holistically to fulfil the over- all research purpose (Stake 2005). This study summarises the systematic investigation of how different case companies utilise different AI techniques in improving their SCM overall performances. A cross-case analysis is suitable and is consid- ered more reliable in this particular research (Ramanathan et al. 2017) because cross-case analysis enables comparisons of differences and similarities between the cases. This method is suitable for identifying general trends and also for verification (Yin 2003). 3.2. Data Collection and analysis A semi-structured interview process was developed to collect data from the case companies. The interview questions were open questions raised during the interview. In order to ana- lyse the potential impact of using AI technologies in opera- tions/supply chain, four exploratory case studies were selected. Access to case study data was provided by an IT consulting company assisting industrial companies in their transformation to the use of artificial intelligence. For each case company, different process sections were used in the analysis. Additionally, each case company had a different kind of implementation technology. Several interviews with the development teams building the AI-powered SCM were conducted separately in each case company. Project management and application development experts were included. During the initial stage of each inter- view, a brief description of the study and its objectives were given, and the interview process involved was explained to the interviewees. Each interview took about an hour. Since the scope of this study falls within their job responsibilities, it is expected that the information gathered meets the objec- tives and purpose of the study. The study invited four international companies operating SCM to participate in the interviews. They varied in size, focus and mission. They were selected due to their high level of supply chain participation and high level of innovation technology acceptance. The participating companies were labelled case companies 1, 2, 3, and 4. Because the purpose of this research was to focus mainly on exploration, this case number can be considered sufficient and appropriate to give a valid grounding to this empirical research (Roden et al. 2017). The interview data were analysed and compared through cross-case techniques (Caniato et al. 2012). Correspondingly, all the data were labelled and classified and used for com- paring and identifying the similarities of each company. The results obtained through a cross-case analysis were used to derive and generalise the summary of the cases in the fol- lowing sections. This open coding approach is widely used in case studies (Shaharudin et al. 2015). 4. Exploratory case analysis The main question for each case was to analyse the objec- tives of the AI implementation, the used technology, the expected and delivered impact on key performances and persons involved. The interviews were targeted on persons working with the responsible project manager of the company. 4.1. Case 1: sales configuration Case company 1 is an industrial company manufacturing various sizes of distribution transformers based on customer needs. The sales include communication with the customer in order to have a valid specification and then deliver a quotation which accords with the production specification. Pricing decisions, giving delivery time estimates and other related communication with the engineering/production team is important. Very often in the sales phase, several rounds take place until the final configuration is fixed and specifications are delivered to order fulfilment. Sales configuration is the process part of the sales and distribution and is sometimes referred to as CPQ – Configure Price and Quote. The objective of sales configurator tools is to help maintain a fast communication between customer interface and engineering/production at the company. In practice, such software packages have been developed ini- tially as rule-based systems, which store the key product information in a certain format. Today, this kind of system may comprise several technologies, including constraint sat- isfaction engine solving different conflicting rules and com- municating with external systems such as ERP for delivery time and Production Planning for schedules. Sales personnel or knowledgeable customers can use the system with a web- based user interface and access up- to- date product infor- mation all the time. Based on the configuration history, product selections can be clustered, e.g. using so-called shopping cart analysis, and information regarding the selected products are often bundled and can be utilised in R&D process (Figure 5). The main objectives for using AI technology have been (1) reducing the speed for quotation process, (2) improving the quality of the documents, and (3) reducing the manual work in the process. The objectives for configuration system implementation have been set in the investment project and 10 P. HELO AND Y. HAO the configuration model has been updated and revised dur- ing the product life-cycle updates. 4.2. Case 2: production planning and control Case 2 is a company building sheet metal manufacturing equipment, including machinery for cutting, bending, shear- ing and bending. Equipment is sold to customers as separate machines or as a complete line. Production planning is a key activity at the customers’ sites, ensuring good utilisation of the machinery. Understanding the patterns and principles of the machines and design processes related to producing manufacturing instructions, lots, nests and sched- ules is a complicated task. Controlling various dependencies and conflicting objectives under varying situations requires experience. The company decided to invest in AI technology to sup- port production planners with automated decision support. In practice, the smart connected machinery connects to a cloud-based AI, which reacts to any changes in the produc- tion system or customer order list. The AI uses genetic algo- rithm-based optimisation to suggest new alternatives for production schedules, material changes and tool changes. The decisions improve the impact of production planning, although the decisions are not used to replace humans com- pletely from the system (Figure 6). The main objectives for this case driving the implementa- tion are: (1) improved capacity utilisation of machinery, (2) a more systematic and quick-to-adapt approach for production planning, and (3) separation of control domain and physical assets. The key metrics include on-time delivery, machine utilisation, and order lead-time. Previous performance can be compared with that delivered by the AI system. Another important feature behind investing in AI technology was to build a connected service for the customer’s equipment to provide online guidance for production planning tasks. A centralised AI service links customer machinery to the machine-builder’s fleet, and further services can be intro- duced in the cloud. 4.3. Case 3: quality control of products Case company 3 is a food production plant producing vari- ous types of consumer-packaged foods in various packing and stock-keeping units. The production processes include both manual and automatised sections. A large variety of Figure 5. Configurator system for sales. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 11 quality control is required in the stock-keeping unit level, and this has been based on visual inspection. AI based cam- era stream analysis on the production line can provide detec- tion of products and analysis of possible errors in packaging. The analysis is based on trained image materials and differ- ent features matching these. Deep neural networks (DNN) are used in this application, and new product features can be trained in a relatively short time. Figure 7 below illustrates a high-level principle of how local AI can use video stream in real-time and by using the trained material find if the quality reference is met and the level of confidence of the analysis. DNN detector can be trained to recognise a large variety of product errors and understand even if the product rotation is different from the expected one. The main objectives for the quality control case are: (1) moving from sampled quality control to 100% inspection without adding personnel, (2) building a systematic learning loop on QA (quality assurance) results from production and earlier parts of the process, (3) reducing waste in the process. AI based video stream can improve the quality inspection process, and quality criteria can be stored in a systematic training material format for the AI. 4.4. Case 4: spare parts and maintenance orders The case company is a manufacturer of mobile machines used in constructions. The machines have planned schedules for maintenance based on the calendar and running hours. The basic maintenance includes service tasks which an oper- ator can do, but also events which are required to be completed by authorised service personnel. Each service requires certain spare parts, tools, additives such as lubrica- tion oils, and personnel in order to be completed. The company has invested in IoT, which connects the installed base to the manufacturer’s portal. In the first phase, remote information collected was used to give guidance to customers on asset management. Later, EDGE level process- ing capability was added to the machines. In practice, IoT continuously monitors use of the machine and analyses early signs of part wearing, fatigue and possible breakdowns. Each machine has specific types of failure modes, which are pre- dicted by clustering time-series data and detect- ing anomalies. Anomaly events are categorised by the local machine AI on different levels based on training data. Once the confi- dence level of a certain type of possible failure event triggers the pre-set level, the machine AI sends a message to the machine manufacturer’s centralised portal to make a condi- tion-based maintenance request. The manufacturing service organisation maintains service orders in the ERP system. In case of a high confidence condition-based analysis, the con- struction machine AI can book service and spare parts auto- matically to the site and notify the fleet owner of the service plan triggered by the AI (Figure 8). The main objectives for the spare part case were (1) improved life-cycle of assets by ensuring correct spare part procedures, (2) moving from a calendar-based system to con- dition- based maintenance, and (3) reduced operational expenses and life-cycle costs. Condition- based service is enabled by a local machine-level AI system in combination with the manufacturer’s centralised ERP. Service contracts need to be up-to-date, and authorisation to monitor the fleet Figure 6. Centralised cloud-based AI servers in several factories to deliver better production plans as a service. 12 P. HELO AND Y. HAO is needed. Overall, the operational benefit for the end-user is that the machine builder is able to offer improved service planning and better capacity utilisation of the fleet. 4.5. Analysis The four described cases have had an impact of different organisational parts of the companies. In the case of sales, production planning and service, the persons affected have been domain experts. In the case of quality control, the task is not complicated, but high volume and repetitive. Purely human- based quality inspection would not cover all the products, and some sampling would be required. Improved resource utilisation is the case in production planning and the spare parts management case. In none of the cases have humans been replaced by machines completely, but they take some tasks which have become possible with the new AI technology stack. The systems are not completely autonomous, but rather assist humans at a high-level in repetitive tasks. Figure 9 shows the matching of business processes, potential use cases and data sources connected for AI implementations. From the data source point of view, the cases presented have different raw materials. Sales configuration and produc- tion planning are based on structured data. Quality control and spare part control rely on processing sensor data close to the source. Smart connected devices are common factors for production planning and quality control cases. Tables 2 and 3 below summarise the results of the case analysis. 5. Discussion In this research, we conducted a systematic literature review and exploratory case studies. Based on both theoretical and practical research, several examples and possible applications have been presented. Multiple case studies were carried out Figure 7. Feature detection demonstration for product quality control based on machine vision and DNN. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 13 to compare the various features of AI in SCM. We can see that multiple AI technologies are used to make the SC leaner (reduce waste) and more efficient. This finding coincides with the literature review in the theoretical background sec- tion, concluding that different AI technologies interplay with each other and are used together to implement an applica- tion. An appropriate level of IT infrastructure helps to build process automation and process optimisation for SC tasks. Some common objectives for these planned and expected impacts seem to be: 1. Reduced time needed in decisions or decision support. Computers can pre-screen order documents, make fore- casts, plan production, but a human makes the final Figure 8. Automated spare part orders generated by smart connected product. Figure 9. Matching business processes, potential use cases and data sources connected for AI implementations. 14 P. HELO AND Y. HAO decision. Better preparation has been conducted, but the processes are not fully autonomous. A single person can handle a large volume of cases and concentrate on higher-level problems. This yields a faster response rate and improved process throughput. 2. Human resources for repetitive tasks will be reduced. This affects back-office work, which is needed to com- plete various paper work between organisation entities, including customer front end, production, and services. Process automation, combined with decision support, has a direct impact on jobs that require less knowledge and have been focussing on handling items. 3. A higher capacity utilisation rate is a common objective for several planning activities. Artificial intelligence can conduct operations that give close to real-time guidance for humans on how to improve the current setup. Learning from the past and forecasting future states pre- sent practical use cases for this. Higher utilisation is a common objective for smart connected machines, but also production-related assets and all resources. Figure 10 shows examples and possible mechanisms that are driving AI implementation related to operations and sup- ply chains. The expected impacts and pressure from the mar- ket are quite high, and there is a risk that some objectives are unrealistic in the short term at least. This research comes with limitations. Qualitative research, as such, is often criticised for its lack of scientific rigour. Four case examples do not cover all sectors very well, such as online sales or specific transportation tasks, and further research on imple- mentation patterns is needed. 6. Conclusions The supply chain (SC) is crucial in moving products across vast distances and in supporting interconnection among dif- ferent stakeholders, such as raw materials suppliers, manu- facturers, retailers, logistics companies, and consumers. Therefore, an effective and efficient SC means that these connections can be made accurately, quickly, and at least cost. The critical success factors for SC are information shar- ing, process integration, and collaboration (Fatorachian and Kazemi 2020). Therefore, SC will have to be digitalised and increasingly dependent on technology in the form of IoT and sensors all across the SC, and this will enable them to collect data in real-time. Our study is inspired by the increasing amount of AI implementation recently. Many pieces of research point out that AI has been adopted intensively in SC and has created the most value in the manufacturing industry (Chui and Malhotra 2018). The results of the wide usage of AI have played a critical role in improving supply chain manage- ment. In general, AI and AI applications are one of the Table 2. Case overview. Case 1: Sales configuration Case 2: Production planning and control Case 3: Quality control of products Case 4: Spare parts and maintenance orders Organisation Sales, configure-price-quote Sales/Operations Planning Production Service Primary method Rule-based system with constraint satisfaction programming Genetic algorithm running optimisation Deep Neural Network conducting visual inspection Clustering analysis and anomaly detection with machine learning Objectives Automation of quote processing, replacing human knowledge with artificial intelligence to process offers and orders Ensure that all orders are processed on time and maximise capacity utilisation of production Perform a thorough quality inspection for all parts in the manufacturing phase Processing condition analysis of assets in the field (installed base) and placing automated maintenance and spare part orders Persons involved and how role has changed Salespersons – focus on customer communication; product knowledge and rules are maintained by AI Production planners – daily scheduling is conducted by automated machinery sending order information to central cloud scheduling AI Quality assurance can focus on corrective actions rather than operative inspections Service planning – service calendars are maintained by AI Key performance indicators � Number of orders � Order quality � Speed to process offers � Capacity utilisation � Later orders � Number of inspections / hour � Type A/B errors � Life-cycle costs of asset � Number of rush orders Table 3. Case AI data, learning and control. Case 1: Sales configuration Case 2: Production planning and control Case 3: Quality control of products Case 4: Spare parts and maintenance orders Data Product data, sales offers and orders from ERP Production orders Production camera stream Smart machine collected data from the EDGE Closed-loop learning Analysis of customer offers and orders in terms of product parameters Information updates from factory, machine unavailability triggers re- optimisation of the schedules Camera data is collected from production, manual retraining needed Measuring equipment behaviour from IoT data Learning adjusts Product parameterisation suggestions based on clustering Production schedule New product failure types, improved detection Condition- based maintenance PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 15 most exciting and valuable current fields of research. AI is not only applied in humans’ everyday lives, but also in operations and supply chain management. AI-based SC is a comprehensively integrated technology and management system based on information and intelligent technology to realise intelligence, network, synergy, integration, and auto- mation. By means of integration with AI, supply chain man- agement is becoming autonomous SC with the characteristics of being self-aware, self-governing and self- determining, and self-optimizing. Our study addresses an important gap in the literature as to how AI can be implemented in the supply chain management area and how it helps to improve operational performance. Our study is innovative in that it summarises the most recent research and also investigates four real cases in the fields of SCM: customer management, produc- tion management, quality management, and also services management. The findings provide a holistic and meaning- ful understanding of the adoption of AI for SCM in dynamic environments. This research makes contributions to both theory and managerial methods that are usable in practice in the future. As this study was conducted through exploratory case studies, it can lay the foundation for the development and emergence of AI in SCM and impact the SCM’s business per- formance. This research can also offer other future research opportunities. For instance, it considers the critical success factors of the implementation of AI in SCM. Other interesting future research could focus on the investigation of organisa- tional and cultural factors influencing the adoption of an AI operational perspective in the SCM. Although AI has enor- mous potential in SCM, it has a long way to go to realise its real value (Chui and Malhotra 2018). Notes on contributors Petri Helo is a Professor of Industrial Management, Logistics Systems and the head of Networked Value Systems research group, at School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, Finland. His research addresses the management of logistics sys- tems in supply demand networks and use of IT in operations. He is also partner at Wapice Ltd, a soft- ware solution provider of industrial IT – sales config- urator systems and IoT solutions. He has published papers in International Journal of Production Economics, Computers in Industry, Computers and Industrial Engineering, International Journal of Production Research, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Expert Systems with Applications, Decision Support Systems. Yuqiuge Hao is a postdoc researcher in Networked Value Systems research group at School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, Finland, primarily researching on the cloud-based enterprise applications in manufacturing and other computer system science. She received her PhD in Industrial Management from the University of Vaasa, Finland and master degree in Computer Science from the Stockholm University, Sweden. Her current research interests include Industry 4.0, big data, blockchain, and new technologies. She has published several research papers both in inter- national journals and conference proceedings. ORCID Petri Helo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0501-2727 References Amirkolaii, K. N., A. Baboli, M. K. Shahzad, and R. Tonadre. 2017. “Demand Forecasting for Irregular Demands in Business Aircraft Spare Parts Supply Chains by Using Artificial Intelligence (AI).” IFAC- PapersOnLine 50 (1): 15221–15226. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2371. Baryannis, G., S. Dani, and G. Antoniou. 2019. “Predicting Supply Chain Risks Using Machine Learning: The Trade-off between Performance and Interpretability.” Future Generation Computer Systems 101: 993–1004. doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.059. Baryannis, G., S. Validi, S. Dani, and G. Antoniou. 2019. “Supply Chain Risk Management and Artificial Intelligence: state of the Art and Future Research Directions.” International Journal of Production Research 57 (7): 2179–2202. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476. Brynjolfsson, E., and A. McAfee. 2017. “Artificial Intelligence, for Real.” Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/01/artificial-intelligence- for-the-real-world Brynjolfsson, E., D. Rock, and C. Syverson. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics.” In The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Çaliş, B., and S. Bulkan. 2015. “A Research Survey: Review of AI Solution Strategies of Job Shop Scheduling Problem.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 26 (5): 961–973. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0837-8. Caniato, F., M. Caridi, L. Crippa, and A. Moretto. 2012. “Environmental Sustainability in Fashion Supply Chains: An Exploratory Case Based Research.” International Journal of Production Economics 135 (2): 659–670. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.001. Figure 10. Key application areas. 16 P. HELO AND Y. HAO Cavalcante, I. M., E. M. Frazzon, F. A. Forcellini, and D. Ivanov. 2019. “A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Data-Driven Simulation of Resilient Supplier Selection in Digital Manufacturing.” International Journal of Information Management 49: 86–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt. 2019.03.004. Childe, S. J. 2011. “Editorial Case Studies in Operations Management.” Production Planning & Control 22 (2): 107–107. doi:10.1080/09537287. 2011.554736. Choi, T. M., T. C. E. Cheng, and X. Zhao. 2016. “Multi-Methodological Research in Operations Management.” Production and Operations Management 25 (3): 379–389. doi:10.1111/poms.12534. Choi, T. M., S. W. Wallace, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Big Data Analytics in Operations Management.” Production and Operations Management 27 (10): 1868–1883. doi:10.1111/poms.12838. Chui, M., and S. Malhotra. 2018. AI Adoption Advances, but Foundational Barriers Remain. New York: Mckinsey & Company. Davenport, T. H. 2018. “From Analytics to Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Business Analytics 1 (2): 73–78. doi:10.1080/2573234X.2018.1543535. Davenport, T. H., and R. Ronanki. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence for the Real World.” Harvard Business Review 96 (1): 108–116. Duan, Y., J. S. Edwards, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in the Era of Big Data–Evolution, Challenges and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Information Management 48: 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021. Dubey, R., A. Gunasekaran, S. J. Childe, D. J. Bryde, M. Giannakis, C. Foropon, and B. T. Hazen. 2019. “Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Pathway to Operational Performance under the Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Environmental Dynamism: A Study of Manufacturing Organisations.” International Journal of Production Economics 226: 107599. Dwivedi, Y. K., L. Hughes, E. Ismagilova, G. Aarts, C. Coombs, T. Crick Galanos. et al. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy.” International Journal of Information Management : 101994. Erhan, D., C. Szegedy, A. Toshev, and D. Anguelov. 2014. “Scalable Object Detection using Deep Neural Networks.” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2147–2154. Fatorachian, H., and H. Kazemi. 2020. “Impact of Industry 4.0 on Supply Chain Performance.” Production Planning & Control 32(1): 1–19. Fu, T., and B. Sun. 2017. “Application of Speech Recognition Technology in Logistics Selection System.” International Conference on Human Centered Computing, 654–659. Cham: Springer. Goli, A., H. K. Zare, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, and A. Sadeghieh. 2019. “Hybrid Artificial Intelligence and Robust Optimization for a Multi- Objective Product Portfolio Problem Case Study: The Dairy Products Industry.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 137: 106090. doi:10. 1016/j.cie.2019.106090. Gupta, S., and E. C. Jones. 2014. “Optimizing Supply Chain Distribution Using Cloud Based Autonomous Information.” International Journal of Supply Chain Management 3 (4): 79–90. Haas, A. 2020. “Logistics and Supply Chain Intelligence.” In Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management, edited by A. Kolinski, D. Dujak, and P. Golinska-Dawson, 111–129. Cham: Springer. Hellingrath, B., and S. Lechtenberg. 2019. “Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: focusing onto Recognition for Supply Chain Execution.” In K. Bergener, M. R€ackers, and A. Stein, edited by The Art of Structuring, 283–296. Cham: Springer. Hengstler, M., E. Enkel, and S. Duelli. 2016. “Applied Artificial Intelligence and Trust – The Case of Autonomous Vehicles and Medical Assistance Devices.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 105: 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014. Jarrahi, M. H. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making.” Business Horizons 61 (4): 577–586. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007. Jung, Y., C. Hur, and M. Kim. 2018. “Sustainable Situation-Aware Recommendation Services with Collective Intelligence.” Sustainability 10 (5): 1632. doi:10.3390/su10051632. Knoll, D., D. Neumeier, M. Pr€uglmeier, and G. Reinhart. 2019. “An Automated Packaging Planning Approach Using Machine Learning.” Procedia CIRP 81: 576–581. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.158. Kochak, A., and S. Sharma. 2015. “Demand Forecasting Using Neural Network for Supply Chain Management.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research 4 (1): 96–104. Kolinski, A., A. Horzela, M. Cudzilo, and R. Domanski. 2020. “Reference Model of Information Flow in Business Relations with 4pl Operator.” In Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management, edited by A. Kolinski, D. Dujak, and P. Golinska-Dawson, 19–45. Cham: Springer. Korolov, M. 2018. “AI in the Supply Chain: Logistics Gets Smart.” CIO. Supply Chain Management. Available at: https://www.cio.com/article/ 3269513/ai-in-the-supply-chain-logistics-get-smart.html Kousiouris, George, Stylianos Tsarsitalidis, Evangelos Psomakelis, Stavros Koloniaris, Cleopatra Bardaki, Konstantinos Tserpes, Mara Nikolaidou, and Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos. 2019. “A Microservice-Based Framework for Integrating IoT Management Platforms, Semantic and AI Services for Supply Chain Management.” ICT Express 5 (2): 141–145. doi:10.1016/j.icte.2019.04.002. Lamba, K., and S. P. Singh. 2017. “Big Data in Operations and Supply Chain Management: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.” Production Planning & Control 28 (11-12): 877–890. doi:10.1080/ 09537287.2017.1336787. Lee, W. J., H. Wu, H. Yun, H. Kim, M. B. Jun, and J. W. Sutherland. 2019. “Predictive Maintenance of Machine Tool Systems Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Machine Condition Data.” Procedia CIRP 80: 506–511. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.019. Levy, F. 2018. “Computers and Populism: Artificial Intelligence, Jobs, and Politics in the near Term.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34 (3): 393–417. doi:10.1093/oxrep/gry004. Li, Q., and A. Liu. 2019. “Big Data Driven Supply Chain Management.” Procedia CIRP 81: 1089–1094. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.258. Lyutov, A., Y. Uygun, and M. T. H€utt. 2019. “Managing Workflow of Customer Requirements Using Machine Learning.” Computers in Industry 109: 215–225. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.010. Mahroof, K. 2019. “A Human-Centric Perspective Exploring the Readiness towards Smart Warehousing: The Case of a Large Retail Distribution Warehouse.” International Journal of Information Management 45: 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.008. Manzini, R., M. Gamberi, and A. Regattieri. 2005. “Design and Control of a Flexible Order-Picking System (FOPS) a New Integrated Approach to the Implementation of an Expert System.” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 16 (1): 18–35. doi:10.1108/ 17410380510574068. Miller, A. 2004. “Order Picking for the 21st Century Voice vs Scanning Technology.” White Paper, Tompkins Associates, http://www.slide- share.net/rmfuhr/voice-vs-scan-white-paper. Min, H. 2010. “Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Management: theory and Applications.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 13 (1): 13–39. doi:10.1080/13675560902736537. Min, Q., Y. Lu, Z. Liu, C. Su, and B. Wang. 2019. “Machine Learning Based Digital Twin Framework for Production Optimization in Petrochemical Industry.” International Journal of Information Management 49: 502–519. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.020. Mortazavi, A., A. A. Khamseh, and P. Azimi. 2015. “Designing of an Intelligent Self-Adaptive Model for Supply Chain Ordering Management System.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 37: 207–220. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.09.004. Nemati, H. R., D. M. Steiger, L. S. Iyer, and R. T. Herschel. 2002. “Knowledge Warehouse: An Architectural Integration of Knowledge Management, Decision Support, Artificial Intelligence and Data Warehousing.” Decision Support Systems 33 (2): 143–161. doi:10.1016/ S0167-9236(01)00141-5. Nilsson, N. J. 1980. Principles of Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Panetta, K. 2018. “Gartner Predicts 2019 for Supply Chain Operations.” Smarter with Gartner. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/smarter- withgartner/gartner-predicts-2019-for-supply-chain-operations/ PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL 17 Paul, S. K., A. Azeem, and A. K. Ghosh. 2015. “Application of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Artificial Neural Network in Inventory Level Forecasting.” International Journal of Business Information Systems 18 (3): 268–284. doi:10.1504/IJBIS.2015.068164. Ramanathan, R., E. Philpott, Y. Duan, and G. Cao. 2017. “Adoption of Business Analytics and Impact on Performance: A Qualitative Study in Retail.” Production Planning & Control 28 (11–12): 985–998. doi:10. 1080/09537287.2017.1336800. Ransbotham, S., P. Gerbert, M. Reeves, D. Kiron, and M. Spira. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence in Business Gets Real.” MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/artificial-intelligence-in- business-gets-real/ Roden, S., A. Nucciarelli, F. Li, and G. Graham. 2017. “Big Data and the Transformation of Operations Models: A Framework and a New Research Agenda.” Production Planning & Control 28 (11–12): 929–944. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1336792. Russell, S. J., and P. Norvig. 2016. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited. Schiavone, F., and S. Sprenger. 2017. “Operations Management and Digital Technologies.” Production Planning & Control 28 (16): 1281–1283. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1375151. Schoemaker, P. J., and P. E. Tetlock. 2017. “Building a More Intelligent Enterprise.” MIT Sloan Management Review 58 (3): 28. Seyedghorban, Z., H. Tahernejad, R. Meriton, and G. Graham. 2020. “Supply Chain Digitalization: Past, Present and Future.” Production Planning & Control 31 (2-3): 96–114. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019. 1631461. Shaharudin, M. R., K. Govindan, S. Zailani, and K. C. Tan. 2015. “Managing Product Returns to Achieve Supply Chain Sustainability: An Exploratory Study and Research Propositions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 101: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.074. Singh, L. P., and R. T. Challa. 2016. “Integrated Forecasting Using the Discrete Wavelet Theory and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Reduce the Bullwhip Effect in a Supply Chain.” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 17 (2): 157–169. doi:10.1007/s40171-015- 0115-z. Singh, S. K., S. Rathore, and J. H. Park. 2020. “Block IoT Intelligence: A Blockchain-Enabled Intelligent IoT Architecture with Artificial Intelligence.” Future Generation Computer Systems 110: 721–743. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.09.002. Skender, H. P., and P. A. Zaninovi�c. 2020. “Perspectives of Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chains.” In Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management, edited by A. Kolinski, D. Dujak, and P. Golinska-Dawson, 77–92. Cham: Springer. Soleimani, S. 2018. “A Perfect Triangle with: artificial Intelligence, Supply Chain Management, and Financial Technology.” Archives of Business Research 6 (11): 5681. doi:10.14738/abr.611.5681. Solomonoff, R. J. 1985. “The time scale of artificial intelligence: Reflections on social effects.” Human Systems Management 5 (2): 149–153. Stefanovic, N., and D. Stefanovic. 2009. “Supply Chain Business Intelligence: technologies, Issues and Trends.” In Artificial Intelligence: An International Perspective, 217–245. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Stake, R. E. 2005. Qualitative case studies. Tammela, I., A. G. Canen, and P. Helo. 2008. “Time-Based Competition and Multiculturalism: A Comparative Approach to the Brazilian, Danish and Finnish Furniture Industries.” Management Decision 46 (3): 349–364. doi:10.1108/00251740810863834. Tellaeche, A., and R. Arana. 2013. “Machine Learning Algorithms for Quality Control in Plastic Molding Industry.” Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on, 1–4. Umeda, Y., H. Muto, M. Tomita, K. Kondoh, T. Kominami, and Y. Hidaka. 2017. “Warehouse Product Inspection System Achieves Work Efficiency and Quality Improvements.” NEC Technical Journal 12 (1): 40–44. Wu, C., and D. Barnes. 2014. “Partner Selection in Agile Supply Chains: A Fuzzy Intelligent Approach.” Production Planning & Control 25 (10): 821–839. doi:10.1080/09537287.2013.766037. Xu, L. D., E. L. Xu, and L. Li. 2018. “Industry 4.0: State of the Art and Future Trends.” International Journal of Production Research 56 (8): 2941–2962. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research—Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zhu, Y., L. Zhou, C. Xie, G. J. Wang, and T. V. Nguyen. 2019. “Forecasting SMEs’ Credit Risk in Supply Chain Finance with an Enhanced Hybrid Ensemble Machine Learning Approach.” International Journal of Production Economics 211: 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.032. Zijm, H., and M. Klumpp. 2016. “Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Developments and Trends.” In Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation, edited by H. Zijm, M. Klumpp, and U. Clausen, 1–20. Cham: Springer. 18 P. HELO AND Y. HAO Abstract Introduction Theoretical background AI concept Artificial intelligence and supply chain management Developing and deploying AI models in SCM AI training Technological infrastructure Data sources Methodology Research design Data Collection and analysis Exploratory case analysis Case 1: sales configuration Case 2: production planning and control Case 3: quality control of products Case 4: spare parts and maintenance orders Analysis Discussion Conclusions Orcid References