Knowledge Transer
Gorodchaninova, Yulia (2010)
Gorodchaninova, Yulia
2010
Kuvaus
Opinnäytetyö kokotekstinä PDF-muodossa.
Tiivistelmä
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore host context characteristics’ influence on cross-border knowledge transfer using one-way knowledge transfer to Russia as an example.
Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative research design was employed. The data was collected through semi-structured interview sessions. The author assumed, based on the literature review, that national self-uniqueness, chauvinism towards foreign countries, prior status of Russian language, departmental thinking, ability to endure hardship, and disrespect to formal rules among Russians recipients would influence cross-border knowledge transfer. Room was left for other characteristics to appear during the empirical exploration.
Findings – The results showed that these characteristics of Russian host context do influence one-way cross-border knowledge transfer to Russia. The characteristics departmental thinking, disrespect to formal rules and group affiliation were the most common influential factors on recipient learning during cross-border knowledge transfer. The group affiliation characteristic unexpectedly facilitated learning that contradicted previous research.
Research limitations/theoretical implications – Since the study was conducted among Russian recipients the results need to be compiled with further research that include senders’ and expatriates’ views on host context characteristics and their influence on cross-border knowledge transfer.
Practical implications – Before engaging in cross-border knowledge transfer activities senders should keep in mind influential host context characteristics that may interrupt as well as facilitate the process.
Originality/value – The list of Russian host context characteristics, which influence cross-border knowledge transfer was compiled and completed with new empirical evidence. Applications of institutional and cultural theories to cross-border knowledge transfer were challenged and discussed.
Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative research design was employed. The data was collected through semi-structured interview sessions. The author assumed, based on the literature review, that national self-uniqueness, chauvinism towards foreign countries, prior status of Russian language, departmental thinking, ability to endure hardship, and disrespect to formal rules among Russians recipients would influence cross-border knowledge transfer. Room was left for other characteristics to appear during the empirical exploration.
Findings – The results showed that these characteristics of Russian host context do influence one-way cross-border knowledge transfer to Russia. The characteristics departmental thinking, disrespect to formal rules and group affiliation were the most common influential factors on recipient learning during cross-border knowledge transfer. The group affiliation characteristic unexpectedly facilitated learning that contradicted previous research.
Research limitations/theoretical implications – Since the study was conducted among Russian recipients the results need to be compiled with further research that include senders’ and expatriates’ views on host context characteristics and their influence on cross-border knowledge transfer.
Practical implications – Before engaging in cross-border knowledge transfer activities senders should keep in mind influential host context characteristics that may interrupt as well as facilitate the process.
Originality/value – The list of Russian host context characteristics, which influence cross-border knowledge transfer was compiled and completed with new empirical evidence. Applications of institutional and cultural theories to cross-border knowledge transfer were challenged and discussed.