Inclusion as a science, technology, and innovation policy objective in high-income countries : the decoupling dilemma
Kalliomäki, Helka; Kalliokoski, Johanna; Woodson, Thomas; Kunttu, Leena; Kuusisto, Jari (2024-05-07)
Kalliomäki, Helka
Kalliokoski, Johanna
Woodson, Thomas
Kunttu, Leena
Kuusisto, Jari
Oxford University Press
07.05.2024
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024060544886
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024060544886
Kuvaus
vertaisarvioitu
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Tiivistelmä
This paper scrutinizes the objective of inclusion in contemporary science, technology, and innovation (STI) policies by analyzing its manifestations within the broad STI policy language promoting a closer interaction between science and society. We contribute to the STI policy literature by revisiting current conceptualizations that primarily center on marginalized groups. By analyzing the Broader Impacts Criterion and Responsible Research and Innovation frameworks in the USA and the European Union, we show that inclusion in the context of high-income countries is partially decoupling from marginalization and increasingly being instrumentalized to serve impact agendas. Our conceptual framework synthesizing the dimensions of goal setting and agency illustrates the broadening scope of inclusive policies and the emergent decoupling dilemma that has been neglected in the literature. Future research must account for the growing ambiguity of policy language that is facing new legitimacy questions and the blurring of objectives focused on supporting marginalized groups.
Kokoelmat
- Artikkelit [2820]