Risk management improvement in the sales phase of a global construction business to increase the profit of projects and business : Case study
Olli, Maria (2023-12-14)
Olli, Maria
14.12.2023
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe20231214154521
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe20231214154521
Tiivistelmä
This thesis studies the risk management improvement in the sales phase of an energy
construction business and if risk management executed already at this phase can increase the
financial business result through decreasing the negative margin deviation of the projects. The
study is made from the constructor business perspective. The basis of the research method is an
action study. The research question is how and what type of risk management should the global,
case construction business implement in the project sales phase to have a meaningful, positive
impact on the project cost overruns?
The business result of the case company was heavily impacted at the end of 2019 by projects
which were delivered with negative margin deviation. One of the root causes for the result was
studied to be an inadequate risk identification and management at the sales phase.
The theoretical part of the study analyses the concepts of project risk management in general,
risk management specifically in the sales phase of projects and further the risk management in
the construction business. In addition, it reviews the risk management tools as well as the
concept of contingency reservations. Also, the concept of action research is defined and its
relevance for this study is analyzed. The framework for the case action research is also defined.
The practical part of the action research follows the planning and implementation of risk
management process in the case company. The effect of the implemented risk management
process is reviewed against the results on the project margin deviations. Results demonstrate
that the described implementation of risk management in the sales phase of the case company
was successful. The margin deviation summary report demonstrates the A class projects with
implemented risk management practices in sales phase causing 66% less negative margin
deviation in average than projects without risk management. This means that the case company
could increase its profit by 66% having the risk management implemented for all the future A
class projects.
construction business and if risk management executed already at this phase can increase the
financial business result through decreasing the negative margin deviation of the projects. The
study is made from the constructor business perspective. The basis of the research method is an
action study. The research question is how and what type of risk management should the global,
case construction business implement in the project sales phase to have a meaningful, positive
impact on the project cost overruns?
The business result of the case company was heavily impacted at the end of 2019 by projects
which were delivered with negative margin deviation. One of the root causes for the result was
studied to be an inadequate risk identification and management at the sales phase.
The theoretical part of the study analyses the concepts of project risk management in general,
risk management specifically in the sales phase of projects and further the risk management in
the construction business. In addition, it reviews the risk management tools as well as the
concept of contingency reservations. Also, the concept of action research is defined and its
relevance for this study is analyzed. The framework for the case action research is also defined.
The practical part of the action research follows the planning and implementation of risk
management process in the case company. The effect of the implemented risk management
process is reviewed against the results on the project margin deviations. Results demonstrate
that the described implementation of risk management in the sales phase of the case company
was successful. The margin deviation summary report demonstrates the A class projects with
implemented risk management practices in sales phase causing 66% less negative margin
deviation in average than projects without risk management. This means that the case company
could increase its profit by 66% having the risk management implemented for all the future A
class projects.