Research on the indoor temperature regulation characteristics of a nearly zero energy building with the nonlinear heat capacity building components : A simple model
Zhang, Qunli; Liu, Yimo; Zhang, Qiuyue; Wang, Gang; Lü, Xiaoshu (2023-07-13)
Katso/ Avaa
Tiedosto avautuu julkiseksi: : 13.07.2025
Zhang, Qunli
Liu, Yimo
Zhang, Qiuyue
Wang, Gang
Lü, Xiaoshu
Elsevier
13.07.2023
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe20230829111902
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe20230829111902
Kuvaus
vertaisarvioitu
©2023 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY–NC–ND 4.0) license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
©2023 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY–NC–ND 4.0) license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Tiivistelmä
With establishment of global carbon reduction targets, energy conservation and emission reduction of building is imperative. By passive building design method, nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB) can decrease building energy consumption requirements. To reduce indoor temperature fluctuation of the nZEB in heating season, the conventional energy storage materials (CESM) or phase change materials (PCM) are utilized in the building components for thermal storage. The heat capacity of the PCM was simplified as ideal nonlinear heat capacity. To reveal the indoor temperature distribution characteristic in the nZEB affected by the building components with or without the nonlinear heat capacity, a simplified mathematical model was established. Several evaluation indicators were put forward to describe indoor temperature regulation difference between the CESM and the PCM. The results show that indoor temperature distribution characteristics of the nZEB with PCM was significantly different with that of the CESM building. The maximum indoor temperature distribution frequency of the PCM building is much larger than that of the CESM building. The maximum indoor temperature distribution frequency of PCM building was more concentrated and occurred close to the phase transition temperature. The maximum indoor temperature distribution frequency of the CESM is not exceed 10%, however, that of the PCM building can reach 42% in the same work condition. The maximum indoor temperature distribution frequency, the indoor comfort guarantee ratio and the latent heat utilization time ratio of the PCM building can be obviously increased by selecting the phase transition temperature close to the average indoor temperature in the heating season. The study work represent that the PCM building components with the nonlinear heat capacity can regulate the indoor temperature distribution frequency by change phase transition temperature.
Kokoelmat
- Artikkelit [2820]