An Extreme Learning Machine Model for Venue Presence Detection
Khan, Wiqar; Raza, Asif; Kuusniemi, Heidi; Elmusrati, Mohammed; Espinosa-Leal, Leonardo (2023-01-19)
Khan, Wiqar
Raza, Asif
Kuusniemi, Heidi
Elmusrati, Mohammed
Espinosa-Leal, Leonardo
Editori(t)
Björk, Kaj-Mikael
Springer
19.01.2023
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023042638947
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023042638947
Kuvaus
vertaisarvioitu
©2023 Springer. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Proceedings of ELM 2021: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21678-7
©2023 Springer. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Proceedings of ELM 2021: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21678-7
Tiivistelmä
Value-added services allocation or denial in a particular venue for a given user is of high significance. It will get more prominent as we move to 5G and 6G networks’ roll out, as we will get other means to have better aids. In this paper, Extreme Learning Machines (ELM) model performance is compared with Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF) models for venue presence detection. The input data is collected from the number of UEs (User Equipment) simultaneously placed inside and outside a venue and kept for longer duration. UEs logs essential data such as received signal reference power for serving cells and neighbor candidate cells, along with other network information. Our findings show that ELM model performs above 95% accuracy for a count of zero, one, and two neighbors. The results get better as we consider the collected data from more neighbors’ cells in our ELM computation.
Kokoelmat
- Artikkelit [2803]