Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • OSUVA
  • Artikkelit
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • OSUVA
  • Artikkelit
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Boosting Smart Building Energy Saving Capacity using Phase Change Materials

Kheradmand, Mohammad; Javadi, Sara; Lü, Xiaoshu (2020-09-22)

 
Katso/Avaa
Artikkeli (299.8Kb)
Lataukset: 

URI
https://doi.org/10.1109/SEST48500.2020.9203415

Kheradmand, Mohammad
Javadi, Sara
Lü, Xiaoshu
IEEE
22.09.2020
doi:10.1109/SEST48500.2020.9203415
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202103197866

Kuvaus

vertaisarvioitu
©2020 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Tiivistelmä
Energy consumption in buildings accounts for over 30% of the total energy use in the world, so it is a priority in the EU. Phase change materials (PCMs) can assist for thermal regulation, because they can save and release the heat. In smart buildings, consumers can incorporate in managing building energy systems, by Demand Response Programs (DRPs). One applicable method is to include PCM as interior coating. Two groups of tests in a test house are investigated concerning: (i) a case in which a PCM is introduced in the mortar; (ii) a base case in that a regular mortar is considered. The two cases are subjected to simulate real temperature variation (summer and winter scenarios). Temperature difference of the "measurement point" showed that the heating/cooling system is turning on for a total of 7.83h under winter scenario for the base case, whereas the PCM case allowed a decrease in the heating time to 7.75h, which represents a 1.1% saving alone. In the case of summer scenario, the heating/cooling system is turning on for 5.5h per day in the base case, whereas the PCM case allowed a decrease in the heating time to 5h, which illustrates a 10% saving alone.
Kokoelmat
  • Artikkelit [2016]
https://osuva.uwasa.fi
Ota yhteyttä | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

TekijäNimekeAsiasanaYksikkö / TiedekuntaOppiaineJulkaisuaikaKokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
https://osuva.uwasa.fi
Ota yhteyttä | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste